The code that I gave to Alex rewrites the old 2.x metadata
as a bridge to the new stuff.
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 09:33 -0400, scott.stark(a)jboss.org wrote:
A problem showing up in 1.4 container to 5 container interop, as well
as merging duplicate behavior into common deployers is the lack of a unified metadata
view. The metadata view is also not authoritative. For example, the jndi name under which
home proxies are bound is not simply the
org.jboss.ejb3.metamodel.EnterpriseBean.getJndiName or transport derived variation like
the org.jboss.metadata.BeanMetaData.getInvokerBinding. We have to have a consistent and
complete metadata view so that proxy factory x obtains the name to bind the proxy under is
a simple lookup against the metadata. There cannot be container specific logic if this is
the be manageable and refactorable.
In terms of the unified metadata work:
https://svn.jboss.org/repos/common/jbossxb-builder/trunk/src/test/java/or...
what exists in terms of backward compatibility with the old models? I thought Adrian said
he had something that would allow coding using the old models to write through to the new
model.
The metadata model should also be in a separate project. I suppose this should be under
the
https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/integration/trunk/ as a jboss-metadata
project.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4083940#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...
_______________________________________________
jboss-dev-forums mailing list
jboss-dev-forums(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-dev-forums --
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Adrian Brock
Chief Scientist
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx