I think the invoking an ejb should be called just 'java'
As the java activity actually means invoke a java method. At least, that is the reasoning
behind it.
Some more questions we need to think about:
1) there is a <jndi jndi-name="..." /> element in the wiring section of
jpdl. What is then the most consistent way of naming the jndi element ? In that case the
full element specifies only jndi so i don't really know what is the most consistent
here.
2) do we need to distinct between session and entity beans ? or can we use reflection to
find out ? or maybe that doesn't matter any more in ejb 3 ? i don't know.
but if we need to make a distinction in the language between session and entities, we
might have to consider attributes like session-ejb-jndi-name and entity-ejb-jndi-name.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4269938#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...