"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : I'm trying to figure out how the old
configuration worked in terms of precedence
| of all the different flags for parent first or scoped classloading.
|
| It complicated by having two flags for java2ClassLoadingCompliance in jboss-web.xml
| one on the class-loading element and another on the loader repository.
|
| We still aren't doing it properly for the legacy configurations.
|
| As far as I can tell, the attribute on the class-loading element controls behaviour
| at the tomcat classloader level in 4.2.x, but the flag on the loader repository
config
| controls the entire hierarchical loader repository.
| The final value will be overridden by each depending on what you are trying to
achieve.
|
That is correct.
"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote :
| So I think the rules are supposed to be (below true means delegate to parent first).
|
| a) class-loading attribute = true + no loader repository config => true
| b) class-loading attribute = false + no loader repository config => false
| c) class-loading attribute = true + loader repository config = true => true
| d) class-loading attribute = false + loader repository config = true => false
| e) class-loading attribute = true + loader repository config = false => true (1)
| f) class-loading attribute = false + loader repository config = false => false
|
| NOTE (1) is for the edge case where some other classloader is in the web-app's
| loader repository. Since the loader repository has a scoped definition,
| classes in that other classloader would be prefered before the default classloading
| domain.
|
| I think we doing everything correct, except case (d).
| i.e. the loader repository config saying delegate to the parent first is overridding
| the class-loading attribute saying do scoped classloading.
|
| This is because JBossWebAppParsingDeployer is not looking at the
| class-loading attribute when setting up the LoaderRepositoryConfig.
|
| But this code needs moving the WarClassLoaderDeployer anyway
| with it constructing the new ClassLoadingMetaData directly.
Yes, I agree with this.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4157986#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...