[jboss-dev-forums] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Need a NamedObject SimpleMetaType
"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote :
| Based on your "SecurityDomain" example then I don't see this as
anything
| more than a name with qualifier.
|
| i.e. SecurityDomain/Default.
|
| The trivial requirement could be served from the following
| pseudo markup.
|
|
| | public class ConnectionManagerMetaData
| | {
| | @ManagedObjectRef(type="SecurityDomain');
| | public void setSecurityDomain(String securityDomain);
| | }
| |
| | @MangedObject
| | public class SecurityDeployment
| | {
| | @ManagedProperty
| | Collection<SecurityPolicy> getPolicies();
| | }
| |
| | public SecurityPolicyMetaData
| | {
| | @ManagedObjectID(type="SecurityDomain")
| | public String getName();
| | }
| |
|
| I'd actually turn the "policies" managed property into a map by id.
| i.e. the property that gets constructed is not a collection it is effectively.
|
| | Map<String, ManagedObject<SecurityPolicy>>
| |
|
| There is a similar trick going on the 'unified metadata" for
|
| object (id)
| -------------
| ejbs (ejb-name)
| ejb-refs (ejb-ref-name)
| etc.
Ok, something needs to identify that the SecurityDeployment is of type
"SecurityDomain", and identify what the key under the "SecurityDomain"
type is. Presumably something like?
| @ManagementObject(type="SecurityDomain").
| public class SecurityDeployment
| {
| @ManagedProperty
| @ManagedObjectKey
| Collection<SecurityPolicy> getPolicies();
| }
|
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4070681#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...