anonymous wrote : For this reason, I abstracted out the MessagingBuffer interface so it
does not depend on MINA.
The problem is that if i create a new Message it makes an assumption that we are using
Mina and defaults he body to an IoBufferWrapper. If we were using the INVM transport
properly and de/serialising to a ByteBufferWrapper instead when we encode or decode the
message all the headers get written to the ByteBufferImpl and the bod gets written to the
defaulted IoBufferWrapper.
Also when we write the buffer we call buff.array(), isntthat doing a copy anyway?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4158975#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...