January 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Labs] - Problems compiling JBoss Labs

by phillips4jc

We downloaded the latest code from http://anonsvn.labs.jboss.com/labs/jbosslabs/trunk/ and have been trying to compile it. We installed Maven 1.0.2 per the install instructions. We are getting a lot of errors with it just trying to download jar dependencies. Is there a more up to date repository that we should be checking out from? Are there any plans to go to Maven 2, or at least to maven 1.1? What is the time frame for the release of JBossLabs V. 2? Our company would like to evaluate it for use for all their internal projects, as well as projects with business partners. Your help would be greatly appreciated. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3997591#3997591 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3997591

17 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: new user guide

by jeffdelong

A section on delegations would be useful. The delegation APIs are simple and can be covered quickly. More interesting would be to point to some examples. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3997579#3997579 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3997579

17 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - new user guide

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

i think it is about time for a complete update of the jbpm user guide. here is the outline that i currently had in mind: http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JbpmNewUserGuide please, provide feedback here in this forum topic View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3997567#3997567 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3997567

17 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: Serialization Compatibility Tests

by pavel.tsekov＠redhat.com

"manik.surtani(a)jboss.com" wrote : Agreed that some exceptions may get serialised as return values, but as you pointed out, this is not in the list of errors. | | As for other JGroups classes, those that are transported across the wire are marshalled using the TreeCacheMarshaller in 1.4.0, so this is not a problem when talking to 1.4.x. So, if I got it right this means that it is safe to exclude all jgroups classes excepth "*Exception" when testing agains 1.4.0 GA ? "manik.surtani(a)jboss.com" wrote : | This does break down in one scenario though; and this is when we use region-based marshalling (JBC 1.2.x/1.3.x) which forces Java serialization on the payload, including JGroups classes. (When not using region-based marshalling, JGroups Streamable interface is used, which does not make use of Java seriaization) Does 1.4.x support region-based marshalling i.e. for backward compatibility with older versions i.e. is it possible to run 1.4.x with 1.3.x so that they'll exchange java serialized objects ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3997561#3997561 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3997561

17 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: releasing 3.2.Beta1

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

When the process instance starts, it navigates to the task assignment list, if there are tasks... the reason for this (which might be flawed) is that the process may contain, for example, a fork before any tasks, so there could be several tasks initially created. Then you pick the task you are interested in and this brings you to the task instance. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3997554#3997554 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3997554

17 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - default.mf does not exist

by aamonten

HI I have just downloaded the latest revision (59310) of the head, following the instructions at http://www.jboss.com/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=BuildingJBossAOPFromSubversion my problem arise when I try to build the project, I got a build failed | amontenegro@loki ~/jboss-aop/build $ ./build.sh | Searching for build.xml ... | Buildfile: /home/amontenegro/jboss-aop/build/build.xml | | check.inhibit.downloads: | | check.proxy: | | set.proxy: | | createthirdparty: | | _buildmagic:init: | Trying to override old definition of task property | | _buildmagic:init:buildlog: | | configure: | [echo] groups: default | [echo] modules: aop | | init: | | _buildmagic:modules:most: | | ====================================================================== | == Executing 'most' in module 'aop'... | == | | _buildmagic:init: | | configure: | | init: | | _buildmagic:build-bypass-checker: | | _buildmagic:build-bypass-notice: | | _buildmagic:build-bypass-check: | | source-jar: | | BUILD FAILED | /home/amontenegro/jboss-aop/aop/build.xml:420: Manifest file: /home/amontenegro/jboss-aop/aop/output/etc/default.mf does not exist. | | Total time: 4 seconds | I had the same problem both at linux and windows. So my doubt is if there are dependencies on another repository or are the documentation about building the project outdated. Any help would be appretiated. best regards Alejandro View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3997541#3997541 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3997541

17 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Array interception needed for jboss cache

by ben.wang＠jboss.com

Kabir, I need more to work out a prototype from PojoCache side once alpha2 is out this week (or early next week). But here are my initial questions: 1. We have discussed multi-dimensional array before. Can your prototyoe handle it now? 2. I have some reservation regarding to per-VM scope of array interception. a) What happens when I have multiple instances in the VM. E.g., | p1 = new POJO(); | | p2 = new POJO(); | | ... | | p1.array[2] = 10; | | p2.array[2] = 20; | can you differentiate this? 3. Since we don't distinguish the target object, what happens when I have same array field name in different POJO? E.g., | class POJO_A | { | int[] array; | } | and | class POJO_B | { | int[] array; | } | Will I have a problem here? 4. With per-VM scope, we are saying this is like a static field, I think. So naturally, we can't use the "Region" concept that is in JBoss Cache. We will just need to document that. 5. Finally, upon invocation in MyArrayInterceptor, do I have access to the array reference itself, e.g., POJO.array? Can I get it from the ArrayRegistry during invocation? I need this such that I can tie the array to the internal cache store. Thanks, -Ben View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3997501#3997501 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3997501

17 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: releasing 3.2.Beta1

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

ah... and david, it would be good if you focus on communication and keep me posted in your morning. then we still have a few extra cycles during our short working time overlap :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3997468#3997468 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3997468

17 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: releasing 3.2.Beta1

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

build for 3.2.Beta1 succeeds... but there is still a problem in the web app. when starting a new process instance, it doesn't navigate to the form in case there is one. so the original problem is fixed but it introduced a new problem. david, can you have a look at this asap ? thanks. please, keep me posted when fixing things for an imminent release. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3997467#3997467 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3997467

17 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: Detached invokers are too detached from the transport

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

That sounds fine. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3997463#3997463 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3997463

17 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums January 2007