January 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: DB test matrix

by julien＠jboss.com

The success rate has increased to 79.85% (1320 tests) due to the tests for oracle/InstanceContainer which are passing now. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4007167#4007167 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4007167

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: web console deployment problem

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

cool, thanks! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4007150#4007150 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4007150

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - wsgen API, SPI, command line tool, and ant task

by jason.greene＠jboss.com

As of today, I checked in a full implementation of the JAX-WS wsgen tool. This work includes a full API and SPI, as well as an ant task and command line tool. The WebServiceGenerator API is available here: http://labs.jboss.com/file-access/default/members/jbossws/downloads/api-d... The WebServiceGeneratorProvider SPI here: http://labs.jboss.com/file-access/default/members/jbossws/downloads/api-d... A custom provider can be specified using the system property "org.jboss.ws.tools.jaxws.webServiceGeneratorProvider". This property is also available as static public field on WebServiceGenerator. The command line tool documentation is available here: http://labs.jboss.com/file-access/default/members/jbossws/downloads/api-d... The ant task documentation is available here: http://labs.jboss.com/file-access/default/members/jbossws/downloads/api-d... The test case that demonstrates the API is located here: http://fisheye.jboss.com/browse/JBossWS/trunk/jbossws-tests/src/main/java... -Jason View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4007142#4007142 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4007142

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: web console deployment problem

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

Ok, should be fixed now. I had to put commons-io 1.2 out on the repository server since the latest out there was 1.0. I tested uploading a process in the webapp and it works. Also flushed out a bug in the console ant script and a console redirect bug which I somehow missed before. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4007112#4007112 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4007112

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of the JBoss EJB Container] - JBAS-3873, Clarify the setRollbackOnly issue

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3873 what is the non-deterministic behavior that needs to be fixed? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4007101#4007101 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4007101

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: JAXBDeployer

by jason.greene＠jboss.com

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : "jason.greene(a)jboss.com" wrote : | | Either way the mapping of namespace to classes has to be known before unmarshalling, the difference is that you can lazy load classes with JBossXB. If lazy discovery is important, we should get involved with the spec and get it added. | | | The more immeadiate question is whether getting involved with jaxb to get jbossxb features into it is worth while. | I definately can't say, but my guess is that its not necessary at this point. since so much is built on JBossXB. However, longer term it should be looked at IMO. anonymous wrote : | "jason.greene(a)jboss.com" wrote : | | The issue with a mapping like this is that if there is any similarity between the types that could be present on a wildcard, then using schema subtyping is more appropriate. | | | I don't see how that resolves the problem. That just introduces a common base schema type for the interface, but it still has a wildcard because the implementation details are outside of the contract. This is a common issue with a plugin architecture. | It doesn't. I was looking at it from the perspective of how a general xml binding framework should work. Mapping a wildcard to an interface, or common subtype adds restrictions that aren't represented in the schema definition. So Object (or some binding based wildcard java type) is a more natural container for a schema wildcard. However, I can see where being able to add your own generic wildcard type would simplify the programming model. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4007100#4007100 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4007100

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss internal QA (Test Suite)] - Re: testsuite's log4j configuration leads to large reports

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

If that works, great. I was not clear on whether a new stylesheet avoids the current memory problem. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4007075#4007075 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4007075

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: ManagementView refresh

by charles.crouch＠jboss.com

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : | The component name will not be unique in a profile in general because of scoped components like mdbs, local ejbs which only need unique names within their deployment. | Understood. -1 on getComponentByNameAndType. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4007072#4007072 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4007072

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Issues with passivation of nested SFSBs

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

As expected, solution #2 above is not an option; if you don't cache the context the parent bean can't invoke on the child. DOH! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4007068#4007068 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4007068

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss internal QA (Test Suite)] - Re: testsuite's log4j configuration leads to large reports

by jaroslaw.kijanowski

I think it's easier to get xml files without stderr/out by writing a new stylesheet. writing an own formatter or a java program would need to integrate it with the testsuite. Finally these "short-version" files could be removed so additional space is not needed. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4007066#4007066 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4007066

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums January 2007