For a top level deployment, the Security Deployer creates a JaccPolicy bean. The JaccPolicy bean also keeps track of all the subdeployments that are jacc capable (ejbs,wars). As and when each of the jacc capable sub-deployments link their PC, they are removed from the internal list. If all the sub-deployments have linked their pc, then the parentpc commits.
The sub-deployments (ejbs,web) need an injection of JaccPolicy to link their PC with it.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4032478#4032478
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4032478
"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : I don't really understand why this is causing the test to fail?
|
| The MDB is designed to recover from the missing jndi name
| and keep trying to startup every 10 seconds until the binding becomes available?
|
| I suspect the test is a bit impatient :-)
The test is not in fact failing. I'm just commenting on all of the noise in the log resulting from the dependency issue. However, I need to validate that test is not producing a false positive and that things are ultimately getting wired up correctly. One test that certainly seems invalid is the durable subscriber test as its using a user that has no valid subscription, so how that is passing is beyond me.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4032477#4032477
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4032477
"weston.price(a)jboss.com" wrote : Just to clarify this is EJB3 or EJB2?
|
| This might be my bug/feature:-)
|
| I added a reconnect attempt state variable to the JMSActivation that halts reconnect attempts after a given threshhold has been exceeded.
|
|
|
The tests I'm looking at are ejb2, but it should be using the same logic as ejb3 under jboss5. Certainly there are still legacy issues that need to be updated, the JMSContainerInvoker being one of them.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4032463#4032463
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4032463