March 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: JBossDDObjectFactory use of SystemPropertiesService

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

System.getProperties() is the source. StringPropertiesService pushes onto the System properties. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4030892#4030892 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4030892

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: JBossDDObjectFactory use of SystemPropertiesService

by bdecoste

You've lost me. StringPropertyReplacer is just a utility to parse for ${...} and replace given a mapping. There is no source for the mapping. I could replace the getValue(String name, String value) logic in the object factory with StringPropertyReplacer, but that can't be what you are suggesting. We need a source for the mapping. StringPropertiesService is the source. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4030890#4030890 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4030890

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: JBossDDObjectFactory use of SystemPropertiesService

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Which is why this should not be used from the object factories. StringPropertiesService is an option means to set properties via xml. The StringPropertyReplacer is still what should be used to retrieve properties as it works regardless of what the source was. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4030888#4030888 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4030888

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: IsLocalInterceptor not detecting local container

by bdecoste

No objections here View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4030886#4030886 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4030886

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: IsLocalInterceptor not detecting local container

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

Back to this; time to get it done. "bstansberry(a)jboss.com" wrote : | To recognize each other the deserialized proxy and the local container need a common piece of info. | | Perhaps including the partitionName is sufficient. Including the partitionName in the container OID/ObjectName won't work, as the ObjectName is created in the EJBContainer c'tor, before any the value of any @Clustered annotation or xml config is available. So, that means the partition name needs to be independently stored in the proxy and the EJBContainer. This means adding a partitionName field to the clustered proxy classes and to EJBContainer, and adding logic to EJBContainer.start() to resolve any @Clustered annotation. I'll add a ClusteredIsLocalInterceptor which tries to match up the proxy with the container, routing the call locally if there's a local bean from the same partition. Any objections to this? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4030884#4030884 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4030884

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: JBossDDObjectFactory use of SystemPropertiesService

by bdecoste

StringPropertiesService gives the user the ability to set params all in one place. EJB2.x provided this capability and we have several customers who requested it in EJB3. The properties are configured in the StringPropertiesService What are you seeing fail or think will fail? The warning you are seeing is just saying that a ${...} pattern was found and the StringPropertiesService is not running. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4030880#4030880 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4030880

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Message store implementation class problem

by mark.little＠jboss.com

Not sure what you mean. The jbossesb-properties.xml file in install/conf talks about org.jboss.soa.esb.persistence.manager.MessageStoreFactoryImpl when that doesn't exist. That's definitely a bug. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4030879#4030879 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4030879

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Message store implementation class problem

by kurt.stam＠jboss.com

I think it may simply be replacing the referenced classes in the jbossesb-properties.xml of our clients. So it may just be a matter of documenting it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4030878#4030878 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4030878

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Message store implementation class problem

by mark.little＠jboss.com

Looks like Daniel missed something before he left. Can you create a JIRA for this? You should have svn access now, so if you've got a fix ... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4030876#4030876 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4030876

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: JBossDDObjectFactory use of SystemPropertiesService

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

You would need to ask whoever added the call to SystemPropertiesService, but I can't see why this coupling should exist. The StringPropertyReplacer is what should be used. I added support to the 2.0.x jbossxb ObjectModelFactory base so that all ObjectModelFactory instance did property substitution via StringPropertyReplacer unless they indicated otherwise. This could be backported to the 1.0.x jbossxb as well. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4030874#4030874 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4030874

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums March 2007