August 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Need a NamedObject SimpleMetaType

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Thinking about the type issue more, I originally was writing tests that had the security-domain property be a Name type as that is how the code is still written. Typically one would have the property be the dependent interface type that one would use, but the security domain bean is not used directly by jca. There is an indirection because jaas is used with a configuration name, and that is what really needs to be matched up between the jca security-domain property and some security domain bean implementation. In this case the Name type is correct in that its describing a dependency on another component, but is too weak in terms of validating what that component provides. What one wants to validate is that the security domain bean provides a jaas login configuration for the indicated name. Don't know how to validate that at this point. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4070188#4070188 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4070188

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Exposing management operations

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

This in addition to the other issue of resolving properties that reference other ManagedObjects seems to need a registry for both name and operation resolution as these are related to runtime components rather than static metadata structures. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4070182#4070182 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4070182

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Need a NamedObject SimpleMetaType

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

The name of the ManagedObject is generally not useful for referencing as its a DeploymentUnit attachment name. This is not usable for a datasource referencing a security domain whose deployment type and attachment type won't be known. You don't think the Name type belongs here, the ManagedObjectRegistry, or both? I don't expect that there will be a bus in the managed project, just the spi to allow references to be resolved. Its also not sufficient to just have the name in the registry. I also need to be able to validate that the source the name is bound to supports the expected property type. I guess this requires the use of the GenericMetaType on the property and source to check that the expected type exists. However, if the source supports an extension of an interface the property wants, this cannot be determined from the classname comparision GenericMetaType supports. The source would have to declare a GenericMetaType for each interface. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4070169#4070169 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4070169

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: JavaBeanValueAnnotationPlugin

by bytor99999

They both have status functionality. In TortoiseSVN they have "check for modification" in the right click menu, third choice from the top In IDEA, There is "Check Directory Status" in the SVN menu, if you choose check against server you get what is changed on the server from what you have, to what you have changed. Also, at the bottom of the screen there should be a "#9. Changes" that if you click on it shows what has changed. It also gives you the ability to group your changes so that you can say have three JIRAs going that don't overlap, and put changes for each JIRA into it's own group, then you can choose to commit just one group and all the files for that JIRA will be commited. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4070166#4070166 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4070166

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Exposing management operations

by bytor99999

Not that I have any brilliant ideas (I steal them anyway), but it seems you need. 1. The definition of the Operations by what type of managed object it is, this will need to be referenced by the Managed Object Type. This is going to be needed to define not only the operation name, but also if it takes any parameters, and also if it returns any values. 2. So the actual Managed Object instance will have a reference to the Managed Object Type to get to the definitions. I can easily be overlooking something here. Wouldn't the Managed Object have the mbean name, so if there was say one method that invokes any operation, you pass the operation definition and the Managed object (with the MBean Name) to that method that would fire it off. Is there any other pieces of information that would also be needed? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4070163#4070163 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4070163

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: Release of JBossXB with no dependence on Oswego Concurre

by adrian＠jboss.org

We can jboss retro jbossxb for 1.4 usage. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4070126#4070126 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4070126

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: JavaBeanValueAnnotationPlugin

by alesj

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | | svn status | grep \? | | | will show you unadded files. Also on Winz? :-) I'll check if IDEA or SVN Tortoise have something similar. Thanks anyway. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4070121#4070121 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4070121

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: JavaBeanValueAnnotationPlugin

by adrian＠jboss.org

| svn status | grep \? | will show you unadded files. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4070117#4070117 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4070117

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Need a NamedObject SimpleMetaType

by adrian＠jboss.org

I don't understand this. This looks like the wrong place for this? Is this intended to be a reference? Why it isn't it enough to just have an annotation in the managed layer? | @ManagedObjectReference | public void setOtherComponent(String name) {} // ==> matches getName() on another ManagedObject | On the registry, surely the profile service already knows all the ManagedObjects and is acting the registrying? I don't think we need to change the Managed project to also have a bus do we? That would would lead to reproducing most of JMX. The purpose of the ManagedObject interface is to avoid having to know there is a bus somewhere (there could be different ones/types). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4070094#4070094 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4070094

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: JavaBeanValueAnnotationPlugin

by alesj

Ups, didn't know it was missing. :-( My IDEA gets totally scre... when dealing with a lot of annotations. It's commited now. btw: is there a SVN function that could help me in these cases - to find other potentially missing files? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4070088#4070088 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4070088

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums August 2007