March 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: cts config startup issue with current vfs trunk

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

The only way I have been able to reproduce this so far is to comment out the initCacheLastModified in SynthenticDirEntryHandler. Still trying to figure out how this can happen. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4133714#4133714 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4133714

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: MC + JAXB (JBossXB Builder)

by adrian＠jboss.org

"alesj" wrote : "adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | | 3) ... update the Spring parsing. | | | Do we really want to also re-write Spring schema into JBossXB Builder annotated metadata, hence removing the .xsd file? | It's not removed. Its just used for validation during parsing. In princple we could also map the same classes to the spring namespace or the unqualified namespace (and use the Spring schema) if that is what Spring actually uses. anonymous wrote : | I don't really want to modify/remove anything that exists in Spring. | But on the other hand, we're already doing that by shipping slightly modified schema file (due to that fix with infinity * infinity). | | Doing that also defeats the purpose of having single metadata to handle both schemas, MC and Spring's. | Since the functionality is almost the same, it's the attribute and element names that differ. | I'm not going to maintain two sets of xml parsing going forwards. If you want to copy the schema initialzier into the Spring project and try to keep it in step that's fine. But don't come crying to me when it breaks. ;-) You should at least change it to use the BeanMetaDataBuilder. ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4133713#4133713 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4133713

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Wildcards and JBossXb Builder

by adrian＠jboss.org

Hard to say without the full stracktrace or a dump of the generated schema. There was this error before: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBXB-120 so maybe this another bug in the same area? The workaround for JBXB-120 was to list the java bean property names in the @XmlType. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4133712#4133712 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4133712

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Management Features on JBoss] - Re: Use of JBAS5 management api's by user apps

by charles.crouch＠jboss.com

And as if by magic, Adrian stirs... "For a web-app, you put the -beans.xml in .... WEB-INF :-) The same goes for any other metadata, e.g. the new jboss-classloading.xml" View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4133711#4133711 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4133711

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Management Features on JBoss] - Re: Use of JBAS5 management api's by user apps

by adrian＠jboss.org

I closed it, read my comment. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4133710#4133710 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4133710

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Management Features on JBoss] - Re: Use of JBAS5 management api's by user apps

by charles.crouch＠jboss.com

Thanks Scott. FWIW I added http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-5271 to cover adding the .war support View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4133706#4133706 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4133706

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Management Features on JBoss] - Re: Use of JBAS5 management api's by user apps

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Sars are for the old jboss mbeans, so either that, or a myapp-config-beans.xml for mc beans in an ear or standalone is what is needed. We should allow war to have a META-INF/myapp-config-beans.xml as well at some point. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4133704#4133704 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4133704

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Management Features on JBoss] - Re: Use of JBAS5 management api's by user apps

by charles.crouch＠jboss.com

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : Correct, other than we don't deploy mc beans from wars right now. Okay, great. That would be a bit of a problem :-). I guess until we do, one could use a more mc bean friendly deployment structure e.g. .sar? and then include the webapp in that. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4133703#4133703 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4133703

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Management Features on JBoss] - Re: Use of JBAS5 management api's by user apps

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Correct, other than we don't deploy mc beans from wars right now. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4133701#4133701 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4133701

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Management Features on JBoss] - Re: Use of JBAS5 management api's by user apps

by charles.crouch＠jboss.com

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : So, if you make your configuration object an mc mbean, and then inject it, you would have a managable configuration object. We should allow injection of mc beans into ee components via an @Resource(...) annotation. | Ok I gotya I think. So make your components mc beans and you're good to go from a ManagedProperty/ManagedObject/ManagedComponent perspective? So one would be able to query/update it as we do DS/JMS components today? The fact that that bean is then bundled up into a .war as part of your application wouldn't be relevant from a management perspective. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4133695#4133695 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4133695

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums March 2008