March 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Features of JBoss Messaaging Message Bridge present in E

by Kevin.Conner＠jboss.com

"beve" wrote : But this only handles the incoming message. Not the part of sending out. This is not true, the outgoing message will also be covered by the transaction. The original 'transacted' notion has recently been tidied up to look at the current transactional context and not the EPR information. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139371#4139371 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139371

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - org.jboss:jboss-common-core pom

by dimitris＠jboss.org

http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCOMMON-44 I've changed a bit the pom of jboss-common-core. Can someone more maven savy confirm I didn't screw up? a) I've declared optional: apache-httpclient:commons-httpclient apache-slide:webdavlib Those are only needed at runtime by org.jboss.net.protocol.http.DavURLLister which is rarely used (if ever) b) I've also removed completely the apache-xerces:xml-apis dependency. I dont' think it's needed. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139370#4139370 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139370

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Features of JBoss Messaaging Message Bridge present in E

by Kevin.Conner＠jboss.com

You already have the ability to make this transactional within the ESB so it is not necessary to use the messaging bridge. There is also no 'reinventing' going on here as we are just using standard JTA and JMS APIs. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139368#4139368 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139368

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Features of JBoss Messaaging Message Bridge present in E

by beve

Sorry my bad...the JMSRouter cannot be used in such a situation. The way we are currently doing this is using the jms-jca-provider to have a global transaction for an action pipeline. So the message acknowledgement is handled by the commit of the transaction. If we rollback the transaction the message will be redelivered. But this only handles the incoming message. Not the part of sending out. /Daniel View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139367#4139367 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139367

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Determine whether an invocation is local or remote

by bdecoste

That should be fine - IsLocalInterceptor sticks the IS_LOCAL, IS_LOCAL metadata flag into the invocation if the client is local to the bean instance. The is local vs remote, not Local vs Remote. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139366#4139366 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139366

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Features of JBoss Messaaging Message Bridge present in E

by timfox

I'd avoid re-inventing the wheel, and leverage what we already have (bridge) for JMS routing. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139343#4139343 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139343

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Features of JBoss Messaaging Message Bridge present in E

by timfox

I concur with dmiley. Depending on the order in which ESB acknowledges the message from source and sends to destination come in, you will get either an "at most once" or "dups_ok" delivery guarantee. For a "once and only once" delivery guarantee the ack and the send need to be in the same transaction. If the source and destination are handled by the same resource manager then that transaction can be a simple local jms tx, otherwise it would need to be a JTA tx. All the above cases are handled by the JBM bridge. I'm not clear they are handled by the ESB router. I would consider guaranteed delivery (once and only once) to be a very common requirement for bridging. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139340#4139340 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139340

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Handling contexts in error

by alesj

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | I imagine it would be related to the incallbacks except a different method gets invoked when there is error during one of the InstallActions? I don't follow you. What have incallbacks and installs to do with error handling? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139333#4139333 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139333

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: CR8 Pom

by adrian＠jboss.org

I've reverted back to the original poms and now my builds work again. ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139329#4139329 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139329

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Handling contexts in error

by adrian＠jboss.org

"alesj" wrote : | Are there any other hooks (api changes), apart ErrorHandlingMode enum, you've had in mind? | Picking up bean in the Controller can be done with Controller::change. You were supposed to discuss it with Julien to get his requirements and work out a proposal. I imagine it would be related to the incallbacks except a different method gets invoked when there is error during one of the InstallActions? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139326#4139326 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139326

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums March 2008