March 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: Refactorings for JBC2.2 (JBCACHE-1222)

by manik.surtani＠jboss.com

I've updated the wiki a bit, added some links to the JIRA, attached the UML diagram, etc. As a comment - could we replace the ZIP archive with a patch file? Easier to view diffs, etc. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139083#4139083 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139083

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Shared Transport in JGroups

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

FYI, I ended up calling the -stacks.xml file "jgroups-channelfactory-stacks.xml". View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139082#4139082 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139082

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: VFSClassLoaderScopingPolicy needs updating

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

The scoped aop tests are passing again, but I have yet to look at your suggestions wrt web classloaders http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-5344 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139081#4139081 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139081

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: Fqns containing just Strings

by manik.surtani＠jboss.com

Certainly some valid points here to consider. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139079#4139079 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139079

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Shared Transport in JGroups

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

Thanks. These are added, revision 71310 of AS trunk. JIRA is http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-5340 . As we discussed they are named "jbm-control" and "jbm-data". Feel free to edit these going forward. FYI I'll probably rename this file to jboss-jgroups-stacks.xml in the next day or so. Let's keep using this thread to discuss the transport protocol configs, perhaps see if we can agree on common configs for the UDP and TCP protocols that we can share between the "udp" stack and "jbm-control" and/or between the "tcp" stack and "jbm-data". http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-5341 Also, to control multicast TTL you guys are using ${jboss.messaging.ipttl:8} . The other stacks are all using ${jgroups.udp.ip_ttl:2} . Is using your own property with a value of 8 important to you? It would be nice to use a single property. In most cases I'd think an admin would want the same value for all usages. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139076#4139076 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139076

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Move dependency management back into app server svn stru

by dimitris＠jboss.org

My view is that the dependencies must be part of the project. Now, if svn:externals can do the trick, that's maybe an implementation issue. Depending on an external project to get your dependencies is developer-unfriendly, as you've found out (and weird, too). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139066#4139066 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139066

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Deployment ClassPath and AOP

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | Also, I don't know whether you saw my comment, but the way | the vfsmemory handler is handling URL is brokens. | I just commited the following to the MemoryTestCase, and it passes: | public void testUrlHandling()throws Exception | { | URL directory = new URL("vfsmemory://guid"); | URL classes = new URL(directory, "classes"); | | URL classes2 = new URL(directory + "/classes"); | | assertEquals(classes, classes2); | assertTrue(classes.equals(classes2)); | } | Did you mean something else? This test looks "weird" :-) "adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | I think this is because you are doing your own manual parsing of the URL | instead of using the api as its meant to be used? | Sorry, please elaborate a bit? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139064#4139064 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139064

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: JBoss Portlet Container 2.0 (JSR-268) support for custom

by julien＠jboss.com

Usually new modes are either mode managed by the portal or by the portlet itself. The portlet mode you are referencing is a pure portal mode, which consist in having the portal sending the instance shared preferences to the portlet associated with the READ_WRITE access mode. The simple portal that makes the JBoss Portlet Container does not support additional modes because it is out of scope of the product. JBoss Portal 2.6 (and therefore 2.7) support this feature already, when the portlet is invoked with EDIT_DEFAULTS, the shared instances preferences are provided wit the READ_WRITE access mode. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139058#4139058 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139058

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - JBoss Portlet Container 2.0 (JSR-268) support for custom por

by Jan.Vissers＠cumquat.nl

Hi, Does JBoss PTL Container 2.0 support custom portlet mode? I want to implement a 'edit defaults' mode and tried to add this in the portlet.xml. However no visual control shows up in the portal. I've used @RenderMode(name = "edit_defaults") on a specific GenericPortlet overriding class method to perform the functionality. Is there no control shown, due to the fact that PTL Container 2.0 doesn't support security? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139045#4139045 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139045

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Move dependency management back into app server svn stru

by pgier

You mean using svn:externals? It could be done that way. That would solve a lot of the issues. The only problem with svn:externals (if I remember correctly) is that you have to specify the entire svn url. Since we use different URLs for anonymous vs non-anonymous, the anonymous checkout might not work with this. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139033#4139033 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139033

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums March 2008