June 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: JcaXAResourceRecovery

by jhalliday

> I think that we should put the wrapper classes (XAResourceWrapper / XidWrapper (JcaXid)) in the JCA SPI, so you can depends on them there. Perhaps not the classes, but a basic interface to the required information would be great. I'd definitely like to see that go into the transactions SPI sometime between 5.0 CR1 and GA. If we can use that to improve the diagnostic info available in the logs it will help a lot with customer support for transaction issues. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4160790#4160790 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4160790

15 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: VFS HDScanner test

by sacha.labourey＠jboss.com

well, yeah, then always copy to /tmp ! For me, using things like "5 seconds timers" are not synonym with "make it work" View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4160788#4160788 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4160788

15 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: VFS HDScanner test

by alesj

Perhaps in version 3.x (and when we hire Marko to do full time on VFS). ;-) Currently we need to get this working to a decent level, covering all stumbling issues; WS serialization usage, Winz locking, ... Golden rule: "make it work, optimize later'. :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4160785#4160785 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4160785

15 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: VFS HDScanner test

by sacha.labourey＠jboss.com

Shouldn't we simply use an OS-dependent solution? i.e. depending on which OS JBoss is running on, we would use a different solution. That would mean that on some OSes, JBoss would be faster/more efficient, while on others it wouldn't. But at least, we would have a safe way of handling all situations. When I read that some solutions rely on timers, it freezes my spine. Also, given that JBoss Web will be included in JBoss 5.0 and given that we will provide by default APR libraries for most OS, couldn't we also use this as part of the OS-specific check and rely on OS-specific native calls to detect whether a file is currently being opened/locked or not? Between the presence of APR libraries and OS-specific checks we should be able to offer a performing solution on most if not all OSes, no? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4160781#4160781 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4160781

15 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Wise based soap client for esb

by maeste

"jeffdelong" wrote : | I have a question about how you would recommend handling ws-security and ws-transaction information. How would you recommend this be added to the SOAP Header? | I have been working with JBoss Transaction XTS component, and have created a quickstart showing ws transactions business activity. But I had to add the transaction context to the SOAPHeader and invoke the web service through my own custom action. I would rather use SOAPClient. well, wise natively support JAX-WS handler to modify SOAP Header. Wise-core support 3 kind of handler: a simple logging handler (to log request and response message), Smooks handler (to transfor header, supporting freemarker too), and custom handler to add any kind of JAX-WS compliant handler. The current implementation of ESB action just support Logging and Smooks ones, but it would be easy to add custom handler too. Anyway Smooks handler have always done the job for me, being very powerful and flexible modifying headers. The third quikstart sample I wrote demostrate a simple use of Smooks handler. It is a very simple use case, but keep in mind you have there all the Smooks' powers ;) Does this answer your question? Do you need something more? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4160770#4160770 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4160770

15 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Coverage on tests

by timfox

Great progress to everyone who's been working on tests, we are almost there! Let's do final push today and tomorrow and get that wiki page completely cleared down by end of the week, then we have a clean slate for the F2F ready to start the rest of the work :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4160769#4160769 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4160769

15 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Deployment redeploy

by alesj

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : That is typical behavior for a directory. | Does this go recursively? e.g. A/B/C/web.xml ... will modification on web.xml show on A as well, or just C? "scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : | We'll have to look to the metadata files for root's that are directories to restore the behavior from the 4.x versions. | That's our constant debate, how to diff between archive and directory in vfs? :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4160761#4160761 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4160761

15 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jPDL 4 early feedback

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

Thanks for pointing that out, Alejandro. Not all of it was clear to me so that proves my point that people should be able to use it without messing with namespaces :-) feature http://apache.org/xml/features/validation/dynamic is not supported in suns JDK 5 Dom parser http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6399139 anonymous wrote : javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory.setFeature( | "http:// customer .org/xml/features/validation/dynamic", true); | | causes the following exception at runtime: | | javax.xml.parsers.ParserConfigurationException: | jaxp_feature_not_supported: Feature | "http:// customer .org/xml/features/validation/dynamic" is not supported. | | ... | | This is fixed in JAXP1.4/JDK6 | Posted Date : 2007-04-03 20:23:47.0 | The only way I got around it was the following: Use a SAX parser. The JDK 5 sax parser supports that feature. Then I 'borrowed' a DOMBuilder from ODE that implements ContentHandler and builds up a DOM (in the meantime it adds the line number information as attributes) Not sure if this is a practical solution going forward. I also wondered if it was necessary. Cause I found out that I was in fact NOT using a validating parser all the time. Our parser that walks the DOM generates most problems anyway. And people will author the process in an XML editor that still *does* support the validation. So the way forward, I think is this: 1) We just use the plain DOM parser when walking the DOM and building the process object model. This does not do any validation 2) We have a list of deployers that is processing a deployment. So we can offer a separate validation deployer step that is configurable. If people use this, they will parse the process 2 times. I don't think that is a big deal. 3) We make the parser that builds up the object model from the DOM configurable. So that users that are using JDK 6 can activate schema validation in the DOM parse if they want to. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4160757#4160757 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4160757

15 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jBPM3 status after switch to maven

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Yes you can. Snapshots can already be consumed from http://snapshots.jboss.org/maven2/org/jboss/jbpm/ View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4160745#4160745 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4160745

15 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Expression Evaluation in ActionHandler Properties

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

All BPM functionality will eventually have to go through the public API. If this is needed please add it to http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-1250 with a reference to this forum thread. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4160742#4160742 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4160742

15 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums June 2008