June 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: JBPAPP-864/EJBTHREE-1109 - clustered home proxies

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

I'm guessing the reason you use the Dispatcher to find the StatefulClusteredProxyFactory in StatefulContainer.createClusteredProxy(Object id) is you lose the id info if you do it via JNDI? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4156995#4156995 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4156995

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Archive root part of classpath/resources flag

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Yes. Those who want strict control can use the jboss-structure.xml. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4156994#4156994 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4156994

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Archive root part of classpath/resources flag

by alesj

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : Correct, add a includeEarRootInClasspath flag. | Should we put it to true by default? To be back compatible by default, but those who want to be really strict can set it to false? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4156991#4156991 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4156991

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Archive root part of classpath/resources flag

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

"alesj" wrote : | In EARStructure it is probably this false that needs to be optional? | | | // Add the ear manifest locations? | | super.addClassPath(root, file, false, true, context); | | Correct, add a includeEarRootInClasspath flag. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4156987#4156987 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4156987

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Archive root part of classpath/resources flag

by alesj

"alesj" wrote : We've already seen a couple of issues like this: | - http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4156755#4156755 | - some Anil's security resources | | In the first item, I very much doubt Seam users will want to write jboss-structure.xml file to make their jbpm, drools, ... files part of classpath. | | Where all should this be applied - ear, ...? | | In EARStructure it is probably this false that needs to be configurable? | | | // Add the ear manifest locations? | | super.addClassPath(root, file, false, true, context); | | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4156984#4156984 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4156984

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Undeploy error on jboss.aop:service=AspectManager

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

I am registering the AspectManager myself from an MC bean. After reading the other thread, I decided to wrap it in a StandardMBean View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4156983#4156983 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4156983

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Archive root part of classpath/resources flag

by alesj

We've already seen a couple of issues like this: - http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4156755#4156755 - some Anil's security resources In the first item, I very much doubt Seam users will want to write jboss-structure.xml file to make their jbpm, drools, ... files part of classpath. Where all should this be applied - ear, ...? In EARStructure it is probably this false that needs to be optional? | // Add the ear manifest locations? | super.addClassPath(root, file, false, true, context); | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4156982#4156982 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4156982

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: trunk Ejb3Deployment is incompatible with jbossas trunk

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

deployers/metadata-deployer-beans.xml has mappings from uri locations to the metadata class in the SchemaResolverConfig bean: |  | <property name="bindingClassesByLocations"> | <map keyClass="java.lang.String" valueClass="java.lang.String"> |  | <entry> | <key>application</key> | <value>org.jboss.metadata.ear.spec.Ear13DTDMetaData</value> | </entry> | <entry> | <key>application_1_2.dtd</key> | <value>org.jboss.metadata.ear.spec.Ear13DTDMetaData</value> | </entry> | | A new set of entrys for the persistence.xml schemaLocation uri xsd need to be added and mapped to the new PersistenceMetaData. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4156980#4156980 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4156980

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Deployment redeploy

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Monitoring the metadata files for changes was the point of this discussion. It should be part of the profile impl is what I'm arguing. Why the profile is looking down to the jsp level is something that needs to be looked at. Its the Profile.getModifiedDeployments call implementation that has this behavior. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4156975#4156975 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4156975

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Seam order or JBAS-5190

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Ok, I see, the jboss-seam-dvd context is not bound. The default jndi naming policy is different now or being overriden by the server policy. We need to reconcile the defaults for earlier apps it appears. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4156974#4156974 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4156974

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums June 2008