July 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Sources are not picked up from snapshots

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

This does not work for me; I don't end up with any source jars (snapshots or not snapshots). Can this please just be set up so we end up with all available source jars in thirdparty simply by running build/build.sh? With so much critical code now pulled out of the AS proper, trying to do AS development is a royal pain. Try to drill down in the code to figure out how something works and you immediately end up with a class without source. At least if the sources are in thirdparty I can add them as needed to the eclipse .classpath files. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4167377#4167377 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4167377

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: portal clustering problem when using optimistic locking

by prabhat.jha＠jboss.com

I was working on a new release of portal last week hence there was no activity on this issue. I am going proceed on this now. Just an FYI. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4167374#4167374 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4167374

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: @RemoteBindings and clientBindUrl - JNDI binding questio

by jaikiran

anonymous wrote : So I read many @RemoteBindings as targeted to expose any N number of bindings for the Default Business Interface Proxy. | So if the @RemoteBindings is just a way to specify multiple bindings, can the clientBindUrl for these N number of bindings can be same or should they differ? I mean can there be 2 different bindings on the same clientBindUrl and the user can expect the proxy to be bound to both these jndi names : @Stateless | @RemoteBindings({ | @RemoteBinding(jndiBinding="MyBean") | @RemoteBinding(jndiBinding="AgainMyBean") --> same default clientBindUrl | }) | public class MyBean implements MyBusinessInterface1, MyBusinessInterface2, MyBusinessInterface3{...} | Just wanted to understand whether the clientBindUrl is just another property of the @RemoteBinding or is it the deciding factor on the number of bindings for the default business proxy. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4167373#4167373 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4167373

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Clustering on JBoss] - Re: Thread dumps generated by triggers/events?

by galder.zamarreno＠jboss.com

I've just realised that I never created a JIRA for a service that would request thread dumps from 1..n nodes upon some trigger or event. Couple of weeks back I saw this JIRA which seems to attempt to do a similar thing: get a thread dump when the server shutdown times out. https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBASM-3 The idea is basically the same except that the triggers are different. My initial motivation is members that didn't response to a sync call, whether AS cluster wide RPC, or JBC's repl sync of data. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4167362#4167362 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4167362

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Remoting refactoring complete

by ataylor

yeah i get the same, about 20 time slower. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4167361#4167361 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4167361

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Remoting refactoring complete

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

This started right after the remoting-refactoring commit. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4167351#4167351 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4167351

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Remoting refactoring complete

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

At the moment, I can only get good perfSender/perfListener results if I change producer and consumer-window-size to something smaller on the ConnectionFactory. from jbm-jndi.xml: <connection-factory name="ConnectionFactory"> | <entry name="ConnectionFactory"/> | <entry name="/ConnectionFactory"/> | <entry name="/XAConnectionFactory"/> | <entry name="java:/ConnectionFactory"/> | <entry name="java:/XAConnectionFactory"/> | <producer-window-size>90000</producer-window-size> | <consumer-window-size>90000</consumer-window-size> | </connection-factory> | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4167350#4167350 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4167350

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: R3 transports to implement

by ron.sigal＠jboss.com

"trustin" wrote : | I'm not following this. Could you explain a little bit further? Regarding 1a, I thought what we need to do is to run two Remoting versions (2 and 3) which calls local EJB3? | I didn't express myself well. I meant that for Remoting 2, calls on an EJB3 would go to AOPRemotingInvocationHandler, and for Remoting 3, they would go to something new, an "AOPRemotingRequestListener", maybe. Of course the EJB3 code itself would be the same. But there would be two paths to the same EJB3. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4167344#4167344 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4167344

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Security on JBoss] - JBoss Negotiation - 2.0.3.Beta2 released, onto 2.0.3.CR1

by darran.lofthouse＠jboss.com

The Beta2 release is now out https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SECURITY-266, so now onto the tasks for the CR1 release (Which should be a real CR release with the potential to be tagged GA). I think the following tasks are the important ones. - Documentation + Formatting for PDF + Additional References - Jira Issues + Review all issues for relevance This one needs to be reviewed https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SECURITY-138 This may be required https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SECURITY-141 but I think the fallback solution should possibly be a bit more generic - overall I don't think this is a blocker for the first CR/GA release. - Packaging / Release + How is this going to be packaged? + Where will the release be uploaded to? + The build needs to be able to create the distribution. Any further comments / requirements for the CR / GA release? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4167317#4167317 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4167317

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: leasing in JBossCache

by testuser1234

"testuser1234" wrote : Hi All, | | Can anybody please help me in knowing how can we mention lease time in JBossCache and can we just keep objects in memory instead of persistence storage to database etc.? | Also how listeners/receivers work in JBossCache? I mean do they need to provide some template to cache for retrieving objects or it is simple key based. | | Thanks. I'm using JBoss 5.0.0CR1. Thanks. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4167286#4167286 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4167286

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums July 2008