March 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: Lock striping broken for Second Level Cache use case

by dukehoops

ok, but it would be an Exception (and not a debug/trace statement). thanks! View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4221360#4221360 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4221360

15 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: Lock striping broken for Second Level Cache use case

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

You'll see org.jboss.cache.TimeoutException. Exactly where depends on which lock stripes conflict. An example is the stack trace in your post in the middle of this page: http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=151524&start=20 That particular stack trace has to do with the timestamps cache used with query caching and can be avoided by not using query caching or putting the timestamps in their own cache. But a similar thing could happen with two entities or collections that happen to hash to the same lock stripe. Same exception but the stack trace would run through the beforeCompletion() method of org.jboss.cache.interceptors.TxInterceptor.LocalSynchronizationHandler or RemoteSynchronizationHandler. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4221359#4221359 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4221359

15 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: Lock striping broken for Second Level Cache use case

by dukehoops

How can I tell if our system is running into this deadlock problem? Will I see something in the logs or will cache simply at times become inconsistent with DB? If something *is* logged, which statements should I look for (specific class/line would be great - so I can configure logging appropriately)? thanks! -nikita View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4221338#4221338 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4221338

15 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Other JBoss Development Design] - Re: default append setting to log/server.log is false

by jaikiran

Now that this param is set to true, do you think it would be better to by default use a size based rolling file appender (for server.log) instead of the time based daily rolling appender. I keep restarting my dev system multiple times a day and just noticed that the size of the server.log had grown up to 300 MB :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4221321#4221321 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4221321

15 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Smooks JavaBinding

by ama1

Hi, I use the following configuration to bind my csv files: <csv:reader | fields="FILE_ID,COMP_ID,ADDR_ID,CNTY_ID,ZIP_ID,CNTRY_ID,STATE_ID,LOC_ID,TWN_ID,ADDR_L1,ADDR_L2,ADDR_STR,ADDR_NUM,ADDR_BOX,DUMMY" | separator=";" quote=""" skipLines="1" /> | | <jb:bindings beanId="add" class="java.util.ArrayList" createOnElement="csv-set" extendLifecycle="true"> | <jb:wiring beanIdRef="addressRecord"/> | </jb:bindings> | <jb:bindings beanId="addressRecord" class="java.util.HashMap" createOnElement="csv-record" extendLifecycle="true"> | <jb:value property="ADDR_ID" data="ADDR_ID"/> | <jb:value property="CNTY_ID" data="CNTY_ID"/> | <jb:value property="ZIP_ID" data="ZIP_ID"/> | <jb:value property="CNTRY_ID" data="CNTRY_ID"/> | <jb:value property="CNTRY_ID" data="CNTRY_ID"/> | <jb:value property="STATE_ID" data="STATE_ID"/> | <jb:value property="LOC_ID" data="LOC_ID"/> | <jb:value property="TWN_ID" data="TWN_ID"/> | <jb:value property="ADDR_L1" data="ADDR_L1"/> | <jb:value property="ADDR_L2" data="ADDR_L2"/> | <jb:value property="ADDR_STR" data="ADDR_STR"/> | <jb:value property="ADDR_NUM" data="ADDR_NUM"/> | <jb:value property="ADDR_BOX" data="ADDR_BOX"/> | </jb:bindings> The result will be a ArrayList<Map<String, Object>>. Is there a way to add an index to have this as result Map<String, Map<String, Object>>, where the Map.Key would be the index (ADDR_ID) and the Map.Value the Address entity-map? Thanks, Patrick View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4221301#4221301 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4221301

15 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Why does the JBM 2 JMS RA do reconnection

by ataylor

I can do it Jesper View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4221273#4221273 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4221273

15 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Why does the JBM 2 JMS RA do reconnection

by jesper.pedersen

Excellent - should Andy or I do the change ? There are probably more properties from the inbound part that are not needed for JBM 2.0... If Andy updates Branch_5_x_JBM2 to be based on 5.1.Beta1 - which has support for java.util.logging - testing would be easier. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4221270#4221270 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4221270

15 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Expose AOP debugging information

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

Hi Wouter, We don't have the manpower right now to add this ourselves. But if you are interested in adding this yourself, you are more than welcome to do so. Please mail me directly if you are interested, so we can go through the formalities needed to get you commit access. "Wouterdb" wrote : note 2 :Whether an advice applied to a field joinpoint is considered to be applied to the field or inside methods accessing the field and whether call joinpoints are part of the caller or the callee is unclear, this is open for discussion. -the field joinpoint is considered to be applied to the field -call joinpoints are part of the caller "Wouterdb" wrote : note 3 :It is (in some cases) possible to make these methods instance methods of their first argument, but it is beyond me whether this would be a good idea If you mean instead of | List<AdviceApplication> applicationsFor(AdviceBinding binding) | doing | class AdviceBinding{ | ... | List<AdviceApplication> applicationsFor() | } | I don't think that is a good idea, the introspective API should be as unintrusive as possible. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4221262#4221262 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4221262

15 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Why does the JBM 2 JMS RA do reconnection

by timfox

I can see reconnection logic in the new JBM 2 RA, JBMActivation::handleFailure. This is unnecessary (and confusing) since JBM session factories handle reconnection themselves. The RA reconnection code and reconnection config settings should be removed. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4221255#4221255 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4221255

15 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: description-tag in TaskNode

by webernie

Sorry! Anyway, thanks for the advice. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4221236#4221236 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4221236

15 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums March 2009