Re: [jboss-dev-forums] [JBoss Transactions Development] - Regression on setRollbackOnly

Mark Little [http://community.jboss.org/people/mark.little%40jboss.com] replied to the discussion "Regression on setRollbackOnly" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/549198#549198 -------------------------------------------------------------- Replying to my own reply ;-) It's clear that the brain-dead JTA specification text around Transaction.setRollbackOnly doesn't consider the case of an inactive transaction when in fact it should, since to have a Transaction reference it doesn't make sense for IllegalStateException to mean "Thrown if the current thread is not associated with a transaction." If that were the case then Transaction should be null. Plus it doesn't work in a multi-threaded environment, particularly if checked transaction semantics are disabled. So it may make sense for derive from ISE rather than SE. Let me sleep on this, or at least have a few beers. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/549198#549198] Start a new discussion in JBoss Transactions Development at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]