rachmatowicz(a)jboss.com wrote :
| 1. Making use of release-admin.xml directly makes sense from the point of view of
centralizing the code to create configurations. However, at present, we are pulling only
pulling in jboss-messaging.jar into testsuite/thirdparty from
repository.jboss.com, and
don't have direct access to release-admin.xml. We are looking for a way to set up the
configuration which makes life easy as well as being well-suited to the existing testsuite
organization.
|
Ruel may have a say on this. The repository also provides a "resources"
directory, that can be used for auxiliary scripts, I reckon. Quote from
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JBossBuild
anonymous wrote :
|
| Repository File Structure
|
| ...
| repository.jboss.com\component name\version\lib
| repository.jboss.com\component name\version\resources
| ...
|
| resources - contains idl files, properties files, things of that nature
|
| ...
|
rachmatowicz(a)jboss.com wrote :
| 2. The JBAS build and testsuite makes use of a number of names for directories
relating to JMS and the existing JBossMQ implementation:
| trunk/messaging
| trunk/testsuite/src/main/jms
| trunk/testsuite/src/main/jmsra
| trunk/testsuite/src/main/jbossmq
| trunk/tetstsuite/src/resources/messaging
| trunk/testsuite/src/resources/jbossmq
|
|
"trunk/messaging" is a wrong name for JBossMQ related stuff to start with, I
would change it to "jbossmq" everywhere it shows up in the source tree. Now with
SVN is easy. This leaves messaging for us. As Tim said, messaging5 is bad.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3968448#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...