"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote :
| I think most of the work will actually be in creating the test coverage.
|
I'm working on getting the official RI OSGi testsuite/tck into place for our tests
(it's gonna take me a while, since the instructions are useless :-)).
But this should take care of the OSGi specific usage tests, weather our impl is OSGi
compliant.
"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote :
| I can think of complicated scenarios in OSGi and for example the scoped domains with
(parent first/last) or "importAll" are addtional features beyond what OSGi can
do.
|
Those 'complicated scenarios in OSGi' should already be a part of official
testsuite (hopefully, otherwise that tck is rubbish).
But for our extensions, it's of course up to us to provide extensive testing.
And I would suggest we do that as part of our OSGi tck project.
Perhaps eventually putting some stuff back to OSGi, as a possible thoroughly tested
extension.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4133317#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...