"tcunning" wrote : I think I agree with Kurt on CommandMessage - I'm not
sure it really has to be a special type of ObjectMessage.
|
Maybe. It seemed to fit the simplification/view approach.
anonymous wrote :
| For the stats gathering, I think we were planning on excluding all CommandMessages
from the counts - basically because there's the potential for them to skew the
statistics a great deal.
|
| We're going to have to check each Message to see if it is a CommandMessage, so
whatever allows you to determine that should be pretty lightweight, especially if there
are a lot of Messages being processed by the ESB. Is isCommandMessage going to be
fast enough?
It should be fast enough. All it's doing is looking at the presence (or absence) of
the command name in the Body.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4070490#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...