"alesj" wrote : "mwringe" wrote : | | But if we use the common metadata approach, this doesn't work as the deployer won't have access to the containers jars in its classpath, so I would still probably have to use the indirect reference method using the MC kernel. | I don't get it. :-) | | How do you then get stuff from container? | Plain object and then hack over reflection? :-) | | You need type safe model. | All the interfaces should be on deployers side, | only some impls at container side. | yes, that how it should work. mwringe needs more coffee today. "alesj" wrote : | This should work with current flat cl model (or "big ball of mud"), | once we kick-in OSGi you should add more exact cl logic + move to proxy services. | | But that's another story. :-) Oh great, OSGi and manipulating jar manifest files, sounds like fun :P View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4209190#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...