In terms of the current schema, its just a different type of element that would need to be
treated separately as the AnnotationMetaData does not have a natural string representation
outside of the annotation attribute values. We would have to make this a richer type of
element with more of a javabean type of property/value structure, but the allowed values
are more restricted.
There already is an AnnotationInfo. Doesn't the inherrited
TypeInfo.convertValue(Object value, boolean replaceProperties) come into play?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4008095#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...