anonymous wrote : Like I said before, there is no guarantee that an allowable destination
exists - this is only used for JMS!!
|
| You're assuming there always an allowable destination for every address that can
be routed to - that is not correct.
|
| Allowable destinations are only used if checkAllowable is true.
I'm not using the allowable destinations to decide on routing, I'm using whatever
mappings exist. If there is no allowable address but just a mapping thats fine, it will
work. Currently the only place it doesn't is like you say when theres an allowable
destination but no mappings. i.e. a topic with no registered consumers. All I'm doing
is making sure that theres always a mapping for every allowable destination, the only
difference is that it may contain no binding's.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4199750#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...