Brian Stansberry wrote:
Steve Ebersole wrote:
> so JBC 3 needs this change anyway?
Yes, if it wants to go in, say, JBoss AS 5.2. Which I'm quite sure the
JBC team wants, since they made a bunch of other more significant
changes to ensure compatibility. This one's real trivial.
> at which point it would be a total
> drop-in replacement?
>
Yes. I just did a diff between head of trunk (which passes 100% w/ JBC
3.0.0.CR1 plugged in) and the hibernate-3.3.1.GA tag and the only
differences are two places where the missing
DefaultCacheFactory.getInstance() call was replaced.
I fixed this compatibility problem awhile ago, but it could have been
after CR1 was tagged.
--
Jason T. Greene
JBoss, a division of Red Hat