Yeah I agree; let's hold back then till we agree on this, although I
suspect we're pretty close to a solution.
On 15 Jun 2007, at 13:41, Jason T. Greene wrote:
I can take a look at sublassing for now (trivial). However I think
the
biggest holdup for CR3 is that POJO changes I need to make for
notifications now that we have changed the behavior of
CacheListener. To
do them I need to make some further enhancements to CacheListener see:
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?
module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4054724#4054724
-Jason
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 19:03 +0100, Manik Surtani wrote:
> I was hoping to cut 2.0.0.CR3 today but we're probably only going to
> be ready for this on Monday. I still need to look at some unit test
> failures plus I want to check JDK6 compat tomorrow.
>
> Jason, do you reckon we should ship CR3 with a snapshot of jboss-
> common-core with the JBCOMMON-25 fix that you did? Passing in the
> sys property will work for the unit tests but I fear people will
> download CR3 and try it on JDK6 and it will break. Rather than to
> ask people to use the sys property I think it may be easier to ship a
> patched jar even if it is a snapshot. Hopefully a new commons-core
> release will be out before CR4.
>
> Thoughts?
> --
> Manik Surtani
>
> Lead, JBoss Cache
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbosscache-dev mailing list
> jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
--
Jason T. Greene
Lead, POJO Cache
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
--
Manik Surtani
Lead, JBoss Cache
JBoss, a division of Red Hat