We're *not* talking about using TCP as default, we're talking about
- looking at *all* configs in
jgroups-multiplexer.sar/META-INF/multiplexer-stacks.xml
- optimizing those
- remove unneeded ones and
- add new ones (e.g. one without FC and message bundling for synchronous
RPCs)
Brian Stansberry wrote:
If what we're talking about here is switching to a TCP-based
stack as
the default, I'd be concerned about doing that until
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JGRP-130 is resolved.
If we're just talking using the optimized configs for each protocol, yes
definitely.
jbosscache-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org wrote:
> Yep, +1
>
>
>
>> In that case, let's complete the JIRA Brian created and then simply
>> copy over the config to JBossCache
>>
>> Manik Surtani wrote:
>>
>>> I was also talking about the default XML files shipped with JBC for
>>> standalone use.
>>>
>>> Multiplexer related changes would only be for usage within AS. --
>>> Manik Surtani
>>>
>>> Lead, JBoss Cache
>>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>>>
>>> Email: manik(a)jboss.org
>>> Telephone: +44 7786 702 706
>>> MSN: manik(a)surtani.org
>>> Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani
>>>
>>>
>>> On 25 Aug 2006, at 13:18, Bela Ban wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Yes - Brian has a JIRA task open regarding this, for the
>>>> Multiplexer. Meaning, you wouldn't be affected
>>>>
>>>> Manik Surtani wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Would this mean a prudent change in the default configs shipped
>>>>> with JBC/JBossAS? --
>>>>> Manik Surtani
>>>>>
>>>>> Lead, JBoss Cache
>>>>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>>>>>
>>>>> Email: manik(a)jboss.org <mailto:manik@jboss.org>
>>>>> Telephone: +44 7786 702 706
>>>>> MSN: manik(a)surtani.org <mailto:manik@surtani.org>
>>>>> Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 25 Aug 2006, at 12:39, Bela Ban wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ben Wang wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bela,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Very good documentation and good numbers. I think once
>>>>>>> threadless stack is ready in 2.5, we will see dramatic
>>>>>>> performance boost on JBoss Cache level as well!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Absolutely ! Parellel processing will definitely help both
>>>>>> JBossCache and clustering (ClusterPartition).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So looks like TCP performs better than UDP now. Is this the
>>>>>>> first time that we have seen this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, that's always been the case for those smaller clusters.
It
>>>>>> will be interesting to see what happens on a 64 node cluster
>>>>>> though.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Bela Ban
>>>>>> Lead JGroups / Manager JBoss Clustering Group JBoss - a division
>>>>>> of Red Hat
>>>>>>
>>>> --Bela Ban
>>>> Lead JGroups / Manager JBoss Clustering Group JBoss - a division
>>>> of Red Hat
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Bela Ban
>> Lead JGroups / Manager JBoss Clustering Group JBoss - a division of
>> Red Hat
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> jbosscache-dev mailing list
> jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
>
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
Ph: 510-396-3864
skype: bstansberry
--
Bela Ban
Lead JGroups / Manager JBoss Clustering Group
JBoss - a division of Red Hat