Re: [jbosscache-dev] Re: [JBoss JIRA] Resolved: (JGRP-65) Performancetests and publish results

If what we're talking about here is switching to a TCP-based stack as the default, I'd be concerned about doing that until http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JGRP-130 is resolved. If we're just talking using the optimized configs for each protocol, yes definitely. jbosscache-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org wrote: > Yep, +1 > > > >> In that case, let's complete the JIRA Brian created and then simply >> copy over the config to JBossCache >> >> Manik Surtani wrote: >> >>> I was also talking about the default XML files shipped with JBC for >>> standalone use. >>> >>> Multiplexer related changes would only be for usage within AS. -- >>> Manik Surtani >>> >>> Lead, JBoss Cache >>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat >>> >>> Email: manik(a)jboss.org >>> Telephone: +44 7786 702 706 >>> MSN: manik(a)surtani.org >>> Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani >>> >>> >>> On 25 Aug 2006, at 13:18, Bela Ban wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Yes - Brian has a JIRA task open regarding this, for the >>>> Multiplexer. Meaning, you wouldn't be affected >>>> >>>> Manik Surtani wrote: >>>> >>>>> Would this mean a prudent change in the default configs shipped >>>>> with JBC/JBossAS? -- >>>>> Manik Surtani >>>>> >>>>> Lead, JBoss Cache >>>>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat >>>>> >>>>> Email: manik(a)jboss.org <mailto:manik@jboss.org> >>>>> Telephone: +44 7786 702 706 >>>>> MSN: manik(a)surtani.org <mailto:manik@surtani.org> >>>>> Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 25 Aug 2006, at 12:39, Bela Ban wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Ben Wang wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Bela, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Very good documentation and good numbers. I think once >>>>>>> threadless stack is ready in 2.5, we will see dramatic >>>>>>> performance boost on JBoss Cache level as well! >>>>>>> >>>>>> Absolutely ! Parellel processing will definitely help both >>>>>> JBossCache and clustering (ClusterPartition). >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> So looks like TCP performs better than UDP now. Is this the >>>>>>> first time that we have seen this? >>>>>>> >>>>>> No, that's always been the case for those smaller clusters. It >>>>>> will be interesting to see what happens on a 64 node cluster >>>>>> though. >>>>>> >>>>>> --Bela Ban >>>>>> Lead JGroups / Manager JBoss Clustering Group JBoss - a division >>>>>> of Red Hat >>>>>> >>>> --Bela Ban >>>> Lead JGroups / Manager JBoss Clustering Group JBoss - a division >>>> of Red Hat >>>> >>>> >>> >> -- >> Bela Ban >> Lead JGroups / Manager JBoss Clustering Group JBoss - a division of >> Red Hat >> >> > _______________________________________________ > jbosscache-dev mailing list > jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev > Brian Stansberry Lead, AS Clustering JBoss, a division of Red Hat Ph: 510-396-3864 skype: bstansberry