Ok, thanks. I'll update JIRA.
--
Manik Surtani
Lead, JBoss Cache
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
Email: manik(a)jboss.org
Telephone: +44 7786 702 706
MSN: manik(a)surtani.org
Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani
On 27 Oct 2006, at 13:23, Ben Wang wrote:
Bummer! This is 3 months old and I'd say my memory has faded a
bit. :-( And it is not easy to reproduce as well unless there is a
way to screw up the FCL .dat file. I remember loader.remove()
somehow doesn't throw an exception there and therefore the code
moves on to notifyActivate and trigger the recursive loop.
Since now that we have documented the FCL limitation, maybe we can
downgrade the serverity and push it back to later releases. This is
a bug associated mostly with FLC. If I run into that problem again,
I will raise it up.
Thanks,
-Ben
-----Original Message-----
From: jbosscache-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:jbosscache-dev-
bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Manik Surtani
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 6:56 PM
To: jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: [jbosscache-dev] JBCACHE-710
Ben,
Trying to understand the problem here, assuming an AS restart
leaves the FCL .dat file in an inconsistent state, wouldn't the
loader.remove
() throw an exception anyway? And this would propagate up, since the
remove() method in the ActivationInterceptor does throw an
Exception ...
--
Manik Surtani
Lead, JBoss Cache
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
Email: manik(a)jboss.org
Telephone: +44 7786 702 706
MSN: manik(a)surtani.org
Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani
_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev