Paul Robinson commented on JBTM-989:
Also, I think it's worth stressing that the reason why this is being suggested is not
because I/we don't like the current code style. It's because using a common
code-style brings efficiencies. Hence the reason why I'm willing to adopt a style that
I don't like.
Consider using a common code style throughout Narayana
Project: JBoss Transaction Manager
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Affects Versions: 5.0.0.M1
Reporter: Paul Robinson
Assignee: Tom Jenkinson
Fix For: 5.0.0.M2
I think we should consider using a common code style throughout the TS project. The
benefits of doing this are as follows:
# You can automate code formatting. This is a real productivity boost as you can type
away, thinking about your code, rather than the style. When you hit save, or trigger it
directly, the code is formatted.
## This is not possible without a project wide code style as you too frequently re-format
code that needs to stay in someone else's personal style. You can't commit this
changed code as; a) it may annoy the "owner" and b) it results in a change that
can't be diffed (every line may be changed).
# We get consistency over the whole project, making it easier to read code written by
# We have to do this anyway for code we maintain inside the JBossAS project as the
project refuses to build if it doesn't adhere to their style.
Personally, I like the style I've used for the last 10 years. I find it harder to
read code that is not in this style. Hence I can understand why people may object to
changing their style. However, this is the very reason why a common style is beneficial.
You can get used to a new style and once you do, the entire project will be styled in the
way that you are used to. Providing the style is sensible, I would much rather use a style
consistent across the projects I work on. I'm happy for that style to be different to
my current style.
As I stated above JBossAS mandates a style at build time. I don't particularly like
the style (braces should occupy their own line, IMO) but I'm happy to go with this one
if it becomes the Narayana standard style.
I think we should also break the build for violations. This should prevent mistakes
making their way into SVN.
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira