]
Paul Robinson commented on JBTM-713:
------------------------------------
Marks description from the duplicate issue:
{quote}
We're working on WS-BA based compensation annotations. That's great, but can we
refactor so that we can support compensations outside of WS-BA? ArjunaCore can support
compensations without Web Services. Maybe the WS-BA annotations vanish entirely, or
collapse down to a subset of what currently exists to support what is truly unique about
WS-BA?
{quote}
Provide a general annotation-based Transaction Framework based on the
BA Framework prototype
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBTM-713
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-713
Project: JBoss Transaction Manager
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: Application Server Integration, Common, Demonstrator, Documentation,
Recovery, Transaction Core, TxBridge, XTS
Affects Versions: 4.9.0
Reporter: Andrew Dinn
Assignee: Paul Robinson
Fix For: 5.0.0.M1
The prototype BA Transaction Management Framework has been useful in clarifying how
JBossTS can simplify some of the tasks developers must perform when designing and
implementing of transactional services. However, the prototype suffers from various
limitations, both in its definition and its implementation. An alternative framework,
preferably one which can embrace multiple transaction protocols (and not just Web Service
transactions), needs to be defined, developed and then incorporated into the TS release.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: