January 2008 - jbossws-users - Jboss List Archives

[JBossWS] - Re: howto: soap header wsdl required=true

by alessio.soldano＠jboss.com

http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4116960#4116960 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4116963#4116963 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4116963

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - Re: UsernameToken authentication using JBossWS

by alessio.soldano＠jboss.com

http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4116960#4116960 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4116961#4116961 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4116961

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - Re: how to set headers in JAX-WS

by alessio.soldano＠jboss.com

I investigated this a bit further... first of all, the reason why you don't get the parameter corresponding to the soap header is that the JAX-WS specs say that only the wsdl:part from the abstract portion of the contract (i.e. the wsdl:portType section) are mapped to Java method parameters. I see three possible solutions to this, unfortunately they're all not so easy / for beginners: - manually modify the wsdl before consuming it, in order to let wsconsume generate the soap header parameter too - create a SOAPHandler and mess with SAAJ to manually add the header when sending the message - leverage SunRI tool (wsimport), which starting from v. 2.1.3 has a new option -XadditionalHeaders that map additional headers in wsdl:binding section as method parameters. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4116960#4116960 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4116960

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - Re: Relationship between wsconsume and wsimport

by alessio.soldano＠jboss.com

Yeah, wsconsume is the JBossWS JAX-WS wsdl consumption tool name. JBossWS JAX-WS are based to the SUN tools, but are not the same. http://jbws.dyndns.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=JBossWS_JAX-WS_Tools View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4116954#4116954 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4116954

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - Re: Clients stopped to work after upgrade from jboss 4.0.5 t

by alessio.soldano＠jboss.com

I guess your problem is exposing services with the same contract as before the upgrade, so that clients do not have to change. If this is your concern, I suggest you to use the top-down-approach http://jbws.dyndns.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=JBossWS_JAX-WS_Tools#Top... i.e. recreate the endpoint interface and related classes given the wsdl contract you don't want to change. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4116951#4116951 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4116951

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - Re: EntityManager injection in Webservice

by alessio.soldano＠jboss.com

AFAIK the injection requires your class to be an EJB. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4116950#4116950 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4116950

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - Re: Problem starting user guide

by alessio.soldano＠jboss.com

"b_" wrote : Hi i'm having the same problem ... i added the TrivialService.class to the classpath but to no avail. | | Can you please tell me how you solved the problem ? http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=126748 Also consider switching to JAX-WS and the new tools http://jbws.dyndns.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=JBossWS_JAX-WS_Tools View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4116948#4116948 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4116948

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - Re: Unsupported content type Exception while consuming Jboss

by alessio.soldano＠jboss.com

The stack complains because it cannot process html messages. I suggest you to check how you set the content-type in your client, since you're actually providing both text/xml and text/html content types. anonymous wrote : | | 2007-12-31 16:00:59,156 DEBUG [org.jboss.ws.binding.soap.SOAPMessageUnMarshaller] getMimeHeaders from: {null=[HTTP/1.1 200 OK], ResponseCodeMessage=OK, Set-cookie=[JSESSIONID=2000581CECAB64B685C0648F6E818CB2;Path=/webauth;Secure], Transfer-encoding=[chunked], http.basic.password=admin12, Date=[Mon, 31 Dec 2007 10:13:45 GMT], http.basic.username=admin, Server=[Sun-ONE-Web-Server/6.1], HEADER={SOAPAction="", Content-Type=text/xml; charset=UTF-8}, Content-type=[text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1], ResponseCode=200} | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4116946#4116946 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4116946

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - Re: new or old issue?

by wtnat

If the jdk version is 1.6.0_01 the following jars needs to be put in the endorsed directory in jre\lib\endorsed: 1. jaxb-api.jar 2. jboss-saaj.jar This might solve the problem View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4116943#4116943 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4116943

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossWS] - Re: Wrong incomming SOAP not intercepted

by alessio.soldano＠jboss.com

"bkruns" wrote : We are running jbossws 1.2.0.SP1 and it still does not seem to be doing the basic WSDL validations. We have an elements setup as minoccurs=1 and it excepts the SOAP message even if that elements is not provided. Do you have the same problem with JBossWS 2.0.X ? You may eventually create a a jira issue with a simple test reproducing the problem so that we can take care of it. Thank you View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4116940#4116940 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4116940

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jbossws-users January 2008