January 2013 - rules-users - Jboss List Archives

by André Fróes

Is there a way to debug my project monitoring if it passes by my rule? In my console i don't see the score of hard constraint of this rule: ---- rule "requiredWorktimeToFinish" when $engineer : Engineer($worktime : worktime) $requiredWorktimeTotal : Number(intValue < $worktime) from accumulate( WorkOrder ( engineer == $engineer, $requiredWorktime : requiredWorktime), sum($requiredWorktime) ) then insertLogical(new IntConstraintOccurrence("requiredWorktimeToFinish", ConstraintType.NEGATIVE_HARD, $requiredWorktimeTotal.intValue() - $worktime, $engineer)); end rule "hardConstraintsBroken" salience -1 when $hardTotal : Number() from accumulate( IntConstraintOccurrence(constraintType == ConstraintType.NEGATIVE_HARD, $weight : weight), sum($weight) ) then scoreHolder.setHardConstraintsBroken($hardTotal.intValue()); end ---- in my console it points no score ---- 17:02:49.009 [main] INFO o.d.p.core.solver.DefaultSolver - Solving started: time spend (127), score (null), new best score (null), random seed (0). 17:02:49.041 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.c.g.DefaultGreedyFitSolverPhase - Step index (0), time spend (164), score (0hard/0soft), initialized planning entity ([WorkOrder-7]). 17:02:49.042 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.c.g.DefaultGreedyFitSolverPhase - Step index (1), time spend (165), score (0hard/0soft), initialized planning entity ([WorkOrder-9]). 17:02:49.043 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.c.g.DefaultGreedyFitSolverPhase - Step index (2), time spend (166), score (0hard/0soft), initialized planning entity ([WorkOrder-8]). 17:02:49.045 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.c.g.DefaultGreedyFitSolverPhase - Step index (3), time spend (168), score (0hard/0soft), initialized planning entity ([WorkOrder-6]). 17:02:49.045 [main] INFO o.d.p.c.c.g.DefaultGreedyFitSolverPhase - Phase constructionHeuristic ended: step total (4), time spend (168), best score (0hard/0soft). 17:02:49.274 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.l.DefaultLocalSearchSolverPhase - Step index (0), time spend (397), score (0hard/0soft), best score (0hard/0soft), accepted/selected move count (1000/1000) for picked step ([WorkOrder-7] => [Engineer-5]). 17:02:49.592 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.l.DefaultLocalSearchSolverPhase - Step index (1), time spend (715), score (0hard/0soft), best score (0hard/0soft), accepted/selected move count (1000/1926) for picked step ([WorkOrder-8] => [Engineer-3]). 17:02:50.045 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.l.DefaultLocalSearchSolverPhase - Step index (2), time spend (1168), score (0hard/0soft), best score (0hard/0soft), accepted/selected move count (1000/3686) for picked step ([WorkOrder-6] => [Engineer-2]). 17:02:50.464 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.l.DefaultLocalSearchSolverPhase - Step index (3), time spend (1587), score (0hard/0soft), best score (0hard/0soft), accepted/selected move count (1000/7516) for picked step ([WorkOrder-9] => [Engineer-2]). 17:02:53.877 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.l.DefaultLocalSearchSolverPhase - Step index (4), time spend (5000), score (0hard/0soft), best score (0hard/0soft), accepted/selected move count (0/350227) for picked step ([WorkOrder-7] => [Engineer-4]). 17:02:53.877 [main] INFO o.d.p.c.l.DefaultLocalSearchSolverPhase - Phase localSearch ended: step total (5), time spend (5000), best score (0hard/0soft). 17:02:53.878 [main] INFO o.d.p.core.solver.DefaultSolver - Solving ended: time spend (5000), best score (0hard/0soft), average calculate count per second (72872).

13 years, 3 months

3
13
0 / 0

Question about caching of MoveListFactory

by Michiel Vermandel

Hi, Is it possible to use caching on a custom created MoveListFactory? I mean, I created a custom MoveListFactory and configured it like this: <moveListFactory> <moveListFactoryClass>my.planner.solver.ProjectShiftFactory</moveListFactoryClass> </moveListFactory> I noticed that the createMoveList method is called upon every step. Though, if I get things right, in the case that the step did not result in a better score, the solution will not be cloned and thus (in my case) the calling of the createMoveList in the next step will result in exactly the same list containing the same object instances. I think it would be OK if the createMoveListis only called when a better score is reached and a cloneSolution will be executed (and thus my object instances get obsolete). 1) I hope my theory makes sense end if so my question is: can I cache the list on the level as described? 2) One more question about steps: if a step does not result in a better score, what happens then? - A new number of moves is launched up to the limit defined by minimalAcceptedSelection? But what is the difference with the previous step? Is it the fact that a "different" solution with the same score will be used as starting point of the new step (given that one uses tabu)? Thanks, Michiel ----------------- http://www.codessentials.com - Your essential software, for free! Follow us at http://twitter.com/#!/Codessentials

13 years, 3 months

2
2
0 / 0

Re: [rules-users] [JBRULES-3703] Error parsing negative numbers in decision table

by metatech

Hi, (Attempt #2 after registering to the mailing list ...). For some reason, I do not have permission to add a comment in JIRA. Please add this answer in a comment on the case JBRULES-3703. Thanks. =============== The reason of the exception is because the number is treated as a float, ie "-1.0". The workaround is to add a single quote before the number and it will work. =============== Lubos Pechac wrote > Compiling attached .xls table results in exception, K12 column contains > "-1". This worked in drools 5.0.1 > org.drools.template.parser.DecisionTableParseException: Priority is not an > integer literal, in cell K12 > at > org.drools.decisiontable.parser.DefaultRuleSheetListener.nextDataCell(DefaultRuleSheetListener.java:607) -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Re-JBRULES-3703-Error-parsing-negative-... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

13 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

Maven2 could not transfer artifect antlr-runtime

by himansu.nayak

Hi, i am trying to build my drools 5.4 project using my hudson environment( using maven2 plugin), but i am getting the below exception. Exception =========== Could not transfer artifact org.antlr:antlr-runtime:pom:3.3 from/to central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2): Error transferring file: Connection timed out: connect My dependency jar in pom is which is correct when i check with central repository. Kindly Help <dependency> <groupId>org.antlr</groupId> <artifactId>antlr-runtime</artifactId> <version>3.3</version> </dependency> ----- Thanks... Himansu -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Maven2-could-not-transfer-artifect-antl... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

13 years, 3 months

2
3
0 / 0

Heap space

by André Fróes

Hello! After trying cloudComputer example i'm trying to implement my own schedule distributor, but now i'm facing heap space error, but i see that it does distribute some work orders. Here's the console error: ------------------- 17:05:02.776 [main] INFO o.d.p.core.solver.DefaultSolver - Solving started: time spend (255), score (null), new best score (null), random seed (0). 17:05:02.821 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.c.g.DefaultGreedyFitSolverPhase - Step index (0), time spend (309), score (0hard/0soft), initialized planning entity ([Engineer-5]). 17:05:02.822 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.c.g.DefaultGreedyFitSolverPhase - Step index (1), time spend (310), score (0hard/0soft), initialized planning entity ([Engineer-4]). 17:05:02.824 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.c.g.DefaultGreedyFitSolverPhase - Step index (2), time spend (311), score (0hard/0soft), initialized planning entity ([Engineer-3]). 17:05:02.824 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.c.g.DefaultGreedyFitSolverPhase - Step index (3), time spend (312), score (0hard/0soft), initialized planning entity ([Engineer-2]). 17:05:02.825 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.c.g.DefaultGreedyFitSolverPhase - Step index (4), time spend (313), score (0hard/0soft), initialized planning entity ([Engineer-1]). 17:05:02.825 [main] INFO o.d.p.c.c.g.DefaultGreedyFitSolverPhase - Phase constructionHeuristic ended: step total (5), time spend (313), best score (0hard/0soft). 17:05:03.020 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.l.DefaultLocalSearchSolverPhase - Step index (0), time spend (508), score (0hard/0soft), best score (0hard/0soft), accepted/selected move count (1000/1000) for picked step ([Engineer-3] => [WorkOrder-12]). 17:05:03.315 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.l.DefaultLocalSearchSolverPhase - Step index (1), time spend (803), score (0hard/0soft), best score (0hard/0soft), accepted/selected move count (1000/1703) for picked step ([Engineer-4] => [WorkOrder-8]). 17:05:03.736 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.l.DefaultLocalSearchSolverPhase - Step index (2), time spend (1224), score (0hard/0soft), best score (0hard/0soft), accepted/selected move count (1000/2657) for picked step ([Engineer-1] => [WorkOrder-8]). 17:05:03.951 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.l.DefaultLocalSearchSolverPhase - Step index (3), time spend (1439), score (0hard/0soft), best score (0hard/0soft), accepted/selected move count (1000/4315) for picked step ([Engineer-5] => [WorkOrder-9]). 17:05:04.251 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.l.DefaultLocalSearchSolverPhase - Step index (4), time spend (1739), score (0hard/0soft), best score (0hard/0soft), accepted/selected move count (1000/9309) for picked step ([Engineer-2] => [WorkOrder-9]). Exception in thread "main" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space at java.util.Arrays.copyOf(Unknown Source) at java.util.Arrays.copyOf(Unknown Source) at java.util.ArrayList.grow(Unknown Source) at java.util.ArrayList.ensureCapacityInternal(Unknown Source) at java.util.ArrayList.add(Unknown Source) at org.drools.planner.core.localsearch.decider.forager.AcceptedForager.addToMaxScoreUnacceptedList(AcceptedForager.java:143) at org.drools.planner.core.localsearch.decider.forager.AcceptedForager.addMove(AcceptedForager.java:101) at org.drools.planner.core.localsearch.decider.DefaultDecider.processMove(DefaultDecider.java:164) at org.drools.planner.core.localsearch.decider.DefaultDecider.doMove(DefaultDecider.java:144) at org.drools.planner.core.localsearch.decider.DefaultDecider.decideNextStep(DefaultDecider.java:116) at org.drools.planner.core.localsearch.DefaultLocalSearchSolverPhase.solve(DefaultLocalSearchSolverPhase.java:62) at org.drools.planner.core.solver.DefaultSolver.runSolverPhases(DefaultSolver.java:190) at org.drools.planner.core.solver.DefaultSolver.solve(DefaultSolver.java:155) at com.swa.planner.domain.WorkOrderTest.main(WorkOrderTest.java:66) ------------------------ it does distribute some engineers to work orders, but after a while, it just show the error. The drl is very simple: -------------------------- import org.drools.planner.core.score.buildin.hardandsoft.HardAndSoftScoreHolder; import org.drools.planner.core.score.constraint.IntConstraintOccurrence; import org.drools.planner.core.score.constraint.ConstraintType; import com.swa.planner.domain.Distributor; import com.swa.planner.domain.Engineer; import com.swa.planner.domain.WorkOrder; global HardAndSoftScoreHolder scoreHolder; rule "requiredTimeToFinish" when $workOrder : WorkOrder($time : time) $requiredTimeTotal : Number(intValue > $time) from accumulate( Engineer ( workOrder == $workOrder, $requiredTime : worktime), sum($requiredTime) ) then insertLogical(new IntConstraintOccurrence("requiredTimeToFinish", ConstraintType.NEGATIVE_HARD, $requiredTimeTotal.intValue() - $time, $workOrder)); end rule "hardConstraintBroken" salience -1 when $hardTotal : Number() from accumulate( IntConstraintOccurrence(constraintType == ConstraintType.NEGATIVE_HARD, $weight : weight) sum($weight) ) then scoreHolder.setHardConstraintsBroken($hardTotal.intValue()); end -------------------------- i guess no error there, i believe that i'm missing when doing the strenght and difficulty comparators dince i didn't really understood the getMultiplicand thing of CloudComputer. here's the implementation, also kept as simple as possible (and probably wrong): ------------ public class WorkOrderStrengthComparator implements Comparator<WorkOrder> { public int compare(WorkOrder a, WorkOrder b) { return new CompareToBuilder().append(a.getTime(), b.getTime()) .append(b.getId(), a.getId()) .toComparison(); } } ------------ public class EngineerDifficultyComparator implements Comparator<Engineer> { public int compare(Engineer a, Engineer b) { return new CompareToBuilder().append(a.getWorktime(), b.getWorktime()) .append(a.getId(), b.getId()) .toComparison(); } } ------------ i'm missing something at these comparators ain't I?

13 years, 3 months

2
6
0 / 0

Custom UI to create rules and inserting them via REST API

by benq2188

Hi everyone, I would like to implement an Expert System which I can have my own UI to generate user defined rules, and I am planning to use REST API to insert/update/delete the rules,which are in the guvnor repository. Inside the guvnor, I would like to store my rules in .drl format. So I was wondering two thing: - Is that possible to create a brl file in XStream xml format as output of the UI, and store it in the repository as .drl format?. (I know the conversion from .brl to .drl is possible by using BRDRLPersistance object.) If it is possible then which object is the key point to create it from the "package org.drools.ide.common.client.modeldriven.brl"? -Another problem, by using REST API I can update and retrieve an asset in text/plain format, however I could not succeed to insert new asset into repository by using POST method. So how can I insert a new .drl rule into repository via REST. I will appreciate if you have some sample code for any of them and will be greatful for any help, Thanks, Bengi. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Custom-UI-to-create-rules-and-inserting... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

13 years, 3 months

3
8
0 / 0

My posts have not been accepted yet

by pooja.ghosh＠accenture.com

Hello, I have posted some 2 or 3 Queries. They haven't been accepted yet. Kindly look into this and post it PLEASE. This is sort of URGENT. :( Thanking in anticipation. Regards, starfisj ________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the e-mail by you is prohibited. Where allowed by local law, electronic communications with Accenture and its affiliates, including e-mail and instant messaging (including content), may be scanned by our systems for the purposes of information security and assessment of internal compliance with Accenture policy. ______________________________________________________________________________________ www.accenture.com

13 years, 3 months

6
8
0 / 0

Planner: localSearch > unionMoveSelector

by Michiel Vermandel

Hi, If I have a default unionMoveSelector in my configuration: <unionMoveSelector> <...MoveSelector/> <...MoveSelector/> <...MoveSelector/> ... </unionMoveSelector> then is the next move selected by random amongst the different move selectors. I think I can understand that from the manual, though want to verify that. Thanks Michiel ----------------- http://www.codessentials.com - Your essential software, for free! Follow us at http://twitter.com/#!/Codessentials

13 years, 3 months

2
2
0 / 0

FW: Implementation of expert system

by Binyala, Krishna Gopal IN BLR SISL

Hello, I am new to drools community... I want to develop an expert system for medical application using drools. can you please let me know how to use history data in drools... Because as far as i know we have to keep all the data in the working memory to access. How should i implement such system? Would be better if you can provide some reference to existing expert system implemented using drools. Thanks in advance. Krishna Gopal In three words I can sum up everything I've learned about life: it goes on... Important notice:This e-mail and any attachment thereto contains corporate proprietary information. If you have received it by mistake, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and delete this e-mail and its attachments from your system. Thank You.

13 years, 3 months

8
11
0 / 0

Capturing condition/constraint evaluation results

by katvik

Hi, We are using decision table in our application and I need to capture the results of the evaluation of every condition of a rule. Is it possible? Thank you. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Capturing-condition-constraint-evaluati... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

13 years, 3 months

4
7
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

rules-users January 2013