Re: [rules-users] Drools 5 Memory Issues

On 28/12/2011 20:31, drools.user wrote: > Thanks for your reply. > > We are one month away from pushing our code into Production. So, I don't > think we will be able to move to 5.4 beta 1. Even though code change > involved might be minimal, it has to go through full testing cycle > which is > very time consuming. Also, I don't think Management will put a beta > release > into Production. give 5.3 a try. > > Is there any workaround to address those listeners issue in 5.2 > itself? What > exactly is the function of listeners and can we tweek our > implementation to > limit the number of listener objects? lots came up on this for the mailing lists, search it. > > Also, what about the object size increase with Drools 5? Is that > expected? we have no data to know either way. If people can show examples that demonstrate different sizes across JVMs

> -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-Memory-Issues-tp3615095p361725... > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users