[rules-users] Dynamic Fact Types

Hello, I am looking for an approach to defining fact types dynamically/programmatically. Having hunted about, I can see a few ways of achieving this. My preferred approach to doing this would be Fact Templates as described in the blog article here: http://orangemile.blogspot.com/2008/07/drools-fact-template-example.html I can see two problems with this approaches. Firstly, it seems to be an experimental feature and generally not supported. Secondly, it only seems to work with primitive fields (perhaps I'm wrong here?). I get the impression that the preferred option is to use Type Declarations. In the documentation for Type Declarations, it suggests that the rules evaluate against an interface rather than an actual Java object and that the interface can be implemented using different methods (POJO, reflection ..). Is there any examples or documentation on how to do this beyond generated Java bean class? Just to be clear, I am looking to define the fact types programmatic in a similar manner to that described in the above blog link, and I am eager to avoid a compilation/class loader step. Many thanks for any help that can be offered, James -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Dynamic-Fact-Types-tp... Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.