[rules-users] Re: [rules-dev] Re : Drools 4.0.x branch has still some issues with serialization

Hi Drools Team, I have checked out *Drools 4.0.x branch* & found that all my test scenarios with *"Dynamic Rules"* are now *working fine* *:-)*. Thanks a lot for fixing the issues so promptly. I appreciate it !!! Now, we will definitely use Drools in our application.

I have a *Good To have* feature request for Drools: "Include check for duplicate objects being asserted into Working Memory & don't generate any activation for such objects or silently don't assert them at all in WM." I tested this scenario with *JESS*, they are already doing that. This will save Drools user from doing duplicate check, which is bit costly now. Or can you please suggest me any simple way, by which still I can achieve this in Drools ?

Thanks & Happy Drooling Siddhartha ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev