This looks like an MVEL issue, since your expression is being converted
into an MVEL predicate. May I ask you please to open a JIRA for that bug?
Meanwhile, a workaround that shall work for you and may give you improved
perf is to split your pattern into 2 patterns using the from keyword:
when
$dto : DTO( )
W250_4_1( value *in*
("0","1","6","7","A","C","D","G","L","M","P"
,"Q","S","V","Z") ) from $dto.w250_4_1
then
Thanks, and hope it helps.
Edson
2007/8/13, Arsalan S. Zaidi <arsalan.zaidi(a)capgemini.com>:
Hi.
I've currently evaluating Drools 4.0 for a project of ours and I'm running
into some problems.
I have a rule which looks like this:
*rule* "W250.42 Editable"
*when*
DTO(w250_4_1.value *in*
("0","1","6","7","A","C","D","G","L",
"M","P","Q","S","V","Z") )
*then*
System.out.println ("0");
Action action = createAction("W250.42", *false*, *true*);
retList.add(action);
*end*
both DTO and w250_4_1 are extremely simple beans. w250_4_1 just has 1
property 'value' which is a String and DTO has one property w250_4_1 which
is the bean w250_4_1.
Now when I put "0" into w250_4_1 then everything works fine. The rule is
true and the 'then' portion is executed. However, if I set w250_4_1 to
"6"
(which is also present in the in (…)) then I get the following error.
*org.drools.RuntimeDroolsException*: Exception executing predicate
org.drools.base.mvel.MVELPredicateExpression@118fa47
at org.drools.rule.PredicateConstraint.isAllowed(*
PredicateConstraint.java:197*)
at org.drools.reteoo.AlphaNode.assertObject(*AlphaNode.java:122*)
at
org.drools.reteoo.CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.propagateAssertObject(*
CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.java:317*)
at org.drools.reteoo.ObjectTypeNode.assertObject(*
ObjectTypeNode.java:168*)
at org.drools.reteoo.Rete.assertObject(*Rete.java:168*)
at org.drools.reteoo.ReteooRuleBase.assertObject(*
ReteooRuleBase.java:190*)
at org.drools.reteoo.ReteooWorkingMemory.doInsert(*
ReteooWorkingMemory.java:70*)
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(*
AbstractWorkingMemory.java:848*)
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(*
AbstractWorkingMemory.java:822*)
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(*
AbstractWorkingMemory.java:623*)
at com.sample.DroolsTest.main(*DroolsTest.java:34*)
Caused by: *org.mvel.PropertyAccessException*: failed to access property:
<<==>> in: class com.sample.DTOShadowProxy
at
org.mvel.optimizers.impl.refl.ReflectiveAccessorOptimizer.compileGetChain(
*ReflectiveAccessorOptimizer.java:137*)
at
org.mvel.optimizers.impl.refl.ReflectiveAccessorOptimizer.optimizeAccessor
(*ReflectiveAccessorOptimizer.java:96*)
at org.mvel.ASTNode.getReducedValueAccelerated(*ASTNode.java:194*)
at org.mvel.ast.Or.getReducedValueAccelerated(*Or.java:18*)
at org.mvel.MVELRuntime.execute(*MVELRuntime.java:87*)
at org.mvel.CompiledExpression.getValue(*CompiledExpression.java:98*
)
at org.mvel.MVEL.executeExpression(*MVEL.java:202*)
at org.drools.base.mvel.MVELPredicateExpression.evaluate(*
MVELPredicateExpression.java:36*)
at org.drools.rule.PredicateConstraint.isAllowed(*
PredicateConstraint.java:191*)
... 10 more
Caused by: *org.mvel.PropertyAccessException*: could not access property
('=')
at
org.mvel.optimizers.impl.refl.ReflectiveAccessorOptimizer.getBeanProperty(
*ReflectiveAccessorOptimizer.java:252*)
at
org.mvel.optimizers.impl.refl.ReflectiveAccessorOptimizer.compileGetChain(
*ReflectiveAccessorOptimizer.java:106*)
... 18 more
If I keep w250_4_1 as "0", but move "0" in the rule to any other
place
place in the in() list (e.g. in ("1","0",…), then I get a similar
error.
I get similar errors when trying to use 'not in' in the same circumstance,
except that then the property is ('!')
What seems to be the issue?
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
--Arsalan
This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential
and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the
person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you
are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or
use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
Office: +55 11 3529-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @
www.jboss.com