Re: [rules-users] "in" syntax breaking the Rete Tree

I can't give you my exact code as it is company-sensitive code. But you can test this against any POJO with a few int and Integer fields. I'm trying to promote Drools Expert in my organisation so I would appreciate your help. It's not causing a problem with rule evaluation. That is working fine. But it doesn't look good when things which should be working are not. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/in-operator-breaking-the-Rete-Tree-tp40... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.