I believe there is a caveat on functions and helper methods called from the
LHS that they need to be constant over time (or at least over the life of
the working memory) which then allows matches to be computed as per normal.
Steve
On 2/13/07, Michael Suzio <msuzio(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The JBoss guys can correct me if I'm wrong, but although I think that
works, what you've just done is eliminate any chance to precompute matches
and trim down the checks that need to happen to find a rule match. Since
the engine can't know that Helper.transform("value") returns a constant
value, it has to re-run that every time and it has to reject for matches to
the rule constraint every time.
I'm sure this would really sink performance, in other words. You can
easily see the effect -- write the rule this way and time it, and then write
it with the return value of Helper.transform being inlined, and I'm sure
there's a big difference. It's the same as any other eval(...) situation in
Drools; possible, but not good for performance.
On 2/12/07, Olenin, Vladimir (MOH) <Vladimir.Olenin(a)moh.gov.on.ca> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if calls to a Helper class are allowed in LHS of the
> rule?
> Eg:
>
> Rule myRule
> When
> MyObject(objField == Helper.transform("value"))
> Then
> // smth
> End
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Vlad
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Steven Williams
Supervising Consultant
Object Consulting
Office: 8615 4500 Mob: 0439 898 668 Fax: 8615 4501
stevenw(a)objectconsulting.com.au
www.objectconsulting.com.au
consulting | development | training | support
our experience makes the difference