Re: [rules-users] Chained Rules

there is the 'extends' feature.. i guess that's what you're looking for. rule "xyz" ... end rule "abc" extends "xyz"... ... end it's been recently talked about in this forum. _ miguel

On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:46 AM, djb <dbrownell83(a)hotmail.com <mailto:dbrownell83@hotmail.com>> wrote: Hi all, I know there are some basic ways to chain rules together, by setting flags in consequences that are checked in the conditions of other rules... but in a large system based on rule templates, where thousands of rules are generated, it is not feasible to chain rules in this manner, especially when they are chained in a somewhat arbitrary fashion (eg. True if Rule 130 AND Rule 200 AND Rule 480 fire) has anyone had this situation before? would I need to execute this as a post-processing step? or, is there any design pattern that will allow rules to be chained, preferably in a manageable way? regards, Daniel -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Chained-Rules-tp77549... Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- "To understand what is recursion you must first understand recursion" _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users