Re: [rules-users] RuntimeDroolsException: Unable to load
by Chong Minsk Goh
Hi Mark,
Thank for the tips. : )
I have added the required mvel14-1.2.8.jar in my classpath. However, I still
encounter the same error.
Could it be a class loader issue or JRE version?
I tried to trace the class loader. Drools is used in my application (running
in netbeans). My application is using java.net.FactoryURLClassLoader. On
plain netbeans project (before the error occurs), the class loader is
sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader. My netbeans is using JRE v 1.6.0
The error occurs when PackageBuilder is initialised.
Package Builder builder = new PackageBuilder();
Also, for the Drools Eclipse plugin (on a seperate occassion), when i import
some codes, it prompt me that Drools project is not a Java 5.0 project.
Best regards!
Eric
Chong Minsk Goh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to run Drools on Netbeans. I have added the jars from
> Drools 4.0.2.
>
> However, I encountered an error
>
> org.doxa.rules.RulesManager - org.drools.RuntimeDroolsException:
> Unable to load dialect
> 'org.drools.rule.builder.dialect.mvel.MVELDialectConfiguration:mvel'
MVEL is a required jar, not an optional one, put it on your classpath
and hopefully this should work for you.
>
> I did not use any MVEL dialects in my rules definition. Here is my rule:
> *
>
> rule
>
> * "Out of Range" *when* m : Message( message == "checkRange" , status
> == 1 )
>
> Range(myMin : myMin, myMax : myMax, myValue : myValue)
>
> Range(myValue < myMin || myValue > myMax)
>
> *then* m.setMessage("");
>
> m.setStatus(0);
>
> *end*
>
> Has anyone attempted using Netbeans with Drools and faced this problem?
>
> Best regards
> Eric
16 years, 5 months
multiprocessor and performance
by Mario
Hi all,
I've got a fairly simple web application with DRools 4.0.3 deployed on a Tomcat
5.5, where I'm running a stress test of about 100 users doing fact changes every
half a second. There are about 20 rules and about 20 facts. Each action loads
and compiles the rule base, creates a new working memory and creates the facts
inside it. I know it's not efficient (rules should be loaded only once in the
application, working memory should be created only once in the session) but
that's not my question.
This is a 4-way machine.
1. if I don't load and use drools, the web application uses all 4 processors
2. if drools does the above mentioned work, only ONE processor is used, at about
100% CPU.
Does it make sense that way? Do I have to set anything so the other processors
are used as well?
Otherwise, I'd have a general performance question: is it more efficient to
empty the WM (one fact at a time) each time many facts need to be reloaded, or
just drop it and create it again? I'm talking about some 200 facts, and a few
hundred rules.
Thanks a lot,
M
16 years, 5 months
inconsistency with 'collect' and the '||' operator
by Adrian Cowham
I'm running into an issue where the || operator embedded in a collect isn't
working as expected. My collect statement is as follows...
$request : AccessRequest($name : username, $ID : sessionID, $loc :
accessLocation, $day : dayOfAccess)
$locationRules : ArrayList(size > 0) from
collect (AccessRule((allowedLocation == "ANY" || allowedLocation
== $loc))
from $group.getRules())
I don't get comilation or runtime errors but I don't the expected behavior
either. That is, I don't get the intersection of AccessRules that have
allowedLocation equal to ANY or allowedLocation equal to the bound $loc
variable. Instead, the empty set is returned.
When I modify the rule to look like
$request : AccessRequest($name : username, $ID : sessionID, $loc :
accessLocation, $day : dayOfAccess)
$locationRules : ArrayList(size > 0) from
collect (AccessRule(allowedLocation == $loc))
from $group.getRules())
I get the expected output.
However, when I modify the rule to look like
$request : AccessRequest($name : username, $ID : sessionID, $loc :
accessLocation, $day : dayOfAccess)
$locationRules : ArrayList(size > 0) from
collect (AccessRule((allowedLocation == "ANY"))
from $group.getRules())
...it returns the empty set even though there are rules that have
allowedLocation set to "ANY" (i confirmed this by debugging my java code). I
haven't seen any documentation that uses the collect statement this way but
according to my understanding of the grammer this should work. For some
reason the allowedLocation == "ANY" embedded in the collect isn't working.
What's interesting to note is that the following rule works flawlessly
(notice the absence of the collect statement)...
rule "test"
when
# does the user that just requested access exist in a group
$request : AccessRequest($name : username, $ID : sessionID, $loc :
accessLocation, $day : dayOfAccess)
$rule : AccessRule(allowedLocation == "ANY" || allowedLocation ==
$loc, allowAccess == "true")
then
System.out.println("Test passed");
end
Any help on the matter would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
a
16 years, 5 months
generalize a rule in "security.drl" file
by Mohamed Mhissen
I use restrictions to control access to my pages.
In my security.drl file, I have :
*Code:*
rule RestrictAccessClientEdit
when
check: PermissionCheck(name == "/ClientEdit.xhtml", action == "render")
Role(name == "admin")
then
check.grant();
rule RestrictAccessOrderEdit
when
check: PermissionCheck(name == "/OrderEdit.xhtml", action == "render")
Role(name == "admin")
then
check.grant();
end;
I want to generalize this restriction so to apply it to all pages
publishing: *Edit.xhtml
I tried like that :
*Code:*
check: PermissionCheck(name == "/*Edit.xhtml", action == "render")
Any help would be very welcome,
Thanks,
--
Mohamed Mhissen
mohamed.mhissen(a)bsaconseil.com
+33.6.65.04.28.79
16 years, 5 months
RE: rules-users Digest, Vol 12, Issue 16
by Sikkandar Nawabjan
am sorry i understand partially. i don't know to use semaphores to control rule. can you give some example
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 20:23:05 +0000
From: Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org>
Subject: Re: [rules-users] RE: How to stop firing rules from dependent
object
To: Rules Users List <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
Message-ID: <47321EA9.7060100(a)codehaus.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
you'll have to setup rules that detect the state of the working memory
that then uses semaphores to control which rules can fire.
Mark
Sikkandar Nawabjan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have 2 Objects and its corresponding drl/dsls to validate the rule
>
> ObjectA - A.drl,A.dsl
>
> ObjectB - B.drl,B.dsl
>
> when i insert ObjectA i want the rules in A.drl to be fired.
>
> when i insert ObjectB along with ObjectA i want to fire rules only from B.drl
>
> There are some rule in B.drl requires ObjectA.so i need to insert always ObjectA with ObjectB. At the same time i don't want the rule from A.drl
>
> How to do that?
>
> Thanks and Regs,
>
> Basha
>
Sikkandar Basha
Tech Lead WPEPDS
UST Global<http://intranet.ustri.com/email/UST-logo.jpg> B5N 144, Bhavani
Technopark, Trivandrum, India
sikkandar.nawabjan(a)ust-global.com <mailto:sikkandar.nawabjan@ust-global.com>
T: +91-471-2335777 Extn: 6802036
M: +91-9946555330
F: +91-471-2527276
________________________________
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org on behalf of rules-users-request(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Thu 11/8/2007 5:21 AM
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: rules-users Digest, Vol 12, Issue 16
Send rules-users mailing list submissions to
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
rules-users-request(a)lists.jboss.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
rules-users-owner(a)lists.jboss.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of rules-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. inconsistency with 'collect' and the '||' operator (Adrian Cowham)
2. Re: inconsistency with 'collect' and the '||' operator (Adrian)
3. RE: Combine DSL and Java Code? (Raj, Govinda (Mohan))
4. Re: RE: How to stop firing rules from dependent object
(Mark Proctor)
5. Re: inconsistency with 'collect' and the '||' operator (Mike D)
6. Re: Combine DSL and Java Code? (Edson Tirelli)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 10:35:17 -0800
From: "Adrian Cowham" <adrian.cowham(a)gmail.com>
Subject: [rules-users] inconsistency with 'collect' and the '||'
operator
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Message-ID:
<470fffa10711071035o4792e8ebs65c3d16551f10859(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I'm running into an issue where the || operator embedded in a collect CE
isn't working as expected. The rule I have is
rule Grant Access"
when
$request : AccessRequest($name : username, $ID : sessionID, $loc :
accessLocation, $day : dayOfAccess)
$user : NetworkUser(username == $name)
$group : UserGroup(users contains $user)
$locationRules : ArrayList(size > 0) from
collect (AccessRule((allowedLocation == "ANY" || allowedLocation
== $loc), allowAccess == "false")
from $group.getRules())
then
# access granted
end
The issue I'm having is with AccessRule((allowedLocation == "ANY" ||
allowedLocation == $loc), allowAccess == "false"), this translate to "all
access rules that have the allowed location set to ANY or set to the
location the user is logging in from". I created a UserGroup named "
super.users" that contains a user named "root" and a single rule that allows
access from ANY location. However, when I simulate a login with "root"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20071107/451e832...
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 19:53:36 +0000 (UTC)
From: Adrian <adrian.cowham(a)gmail.com>
Subject: [rules-users] Re: inconsistency with 'collect' and the '||'
operator
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Message-ID: <loom.20071107T195056-299(a)post.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Adrian Cowham <adrian.cowham <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> I'm running into an issue where the || operator embedded in a collect CE isn't
working as expected. The rule I have is rule Grant Access"
> when
> $request : AccessRequest($name : username, $ID : sessionID, $loc :
accessLocation, $day : dayOfAccess)
> $user : NetworkUser(username == $name)
> $group : UserGroup(users contains $user)
> $locationRules : ArrayList(size > 0) from
> collect (AccessRule((allowedLocation == "ANY" || allowedLocation
== $loc), allowAccess == "false")
> from $group.getRules())
> then
> # access grantedendThe issue I'm having is with
AccessRule((allowedLocation == "ANY" || allowedLocation == $loc), allowAccess ==
"false"), this translate to "all access rules that have the allowed location set
to ANY or set to the location the user is logging in from". I created a
UserGroup named "
> super.users" that contains a user named "root" and a single rule that allows
access from ANY location. However, when I simulate a login with "root"
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users <at> lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
Please ignore this email, I sent this one by accident pre-maturely. I sent my
final draft shortly after. Sorry.
a
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 17:46:46 -0000
From: "Raj, Govinda (Mohan)" <mohan(a)hp.com>
Subject: RE: [rules-users] Combine DSL and Java Code?
To: "Rules Users List" <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
Message-ID:
<4CE2D0FBADA2D04FB93A01341FA2CE5502B8019A(a)G3W0067.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Try changing DSL
from
[consequence][]write "{value}" to stdout=System.out.println("{value}");
To
[consequence][]write {value} to stdout=System.out.println( {value} );
And see if it works.
--Mohan
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Markus Helbig
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 8:09 AM
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: [rules-users] Combine DSL and Java Code?
Hi,
following example:
Item Class:
public class MyItem {
public MyItem() {}
public String getMessage()
{
return "Hello World!";
}
}
DSL:
[condition][]is of type MyItem=MyItem()
[consequence][]write "{value}" to stdout=System.out.println("{value}");
DSRL File:
rule
when
$item: is of type MyItem
then
write $item.getMessage() to stdout
end
Is this "write $item.getMessage() to stdout" possible in any way?
Currently i'm not able to get it to work ...
Cheers
Markus
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4786 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20071107/7f583b3...
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 20:23:05 +0000
From: Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org>
Subject: Re: [rules-users] RE: How to stop firing rules from dependent
object
To: Rules Users List <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
Message-ID: <47321EA9.7060100(a)codehaus.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
you'll have to setup rules that detect the state of the working memory
that then uses semaphores to control which rules can fire.
Mark
Sikkandar Nawabjan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have 2 Objects and its corresponding drl/dsls to validate the rule
>
> ObjectA - A.drl,A.dsl
>
> ObjectB - B.drl,B.dsl
>
> when i insert ObjectA i want the rules in A.drl to be fired.
>
> when i insert ObjectB along with ObjectA i want to fire rules only from B.drl
>
> There are some rule in B.drl requires ObjectA.so i need to insert always ObjectA with ObjectB. At the same time i don't want the rule from A.drl
>
> How to do that?
>
> Thanks and Regs,
>
> Basha
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20071107/04f8801...
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 13:36:33 -0800 (PST)
From: Mike D <mike.dalaker(a)kewill.com>
Subject: Re: [rules-users] inconsistency with 'collect' and the '||'
operator
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Message-ID: <13636646.post(a)talk.nabble.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
did you try AccessRule((allowedLocation in ("ANY", $loc)?
Adrian Cowham wrote:
>
> I'm running into an issue where the || operator embedded in a collect CE
> isn't working as expected. The rule I have is
>
> rule Grant Access"
> when
> $request : AccessRequest($name : username, $ID : sessionID, $loc :
> accessLocation, $day : dayOfAccess)
> $user : NetworkUser(username == $name)
> $group : UserGroup(users contains $user)
> $locationRules : ArrayList(size > 0) from
> collect (AccessRule((allowedLocation == "ANY" ||
> allowedLocation
> == $loc), allowAccess == "false")
> from $group.getRules())
> then
> # access granted
>
> end
>
>
> The issue I'm having is with AccessRule((allowedLocation == "ANY" ||
> allowedLocation == $loc), allowAccess == "false"), this translate to "all
> access rules that have the allowed location set to ANY or set to the
> location the user is logging in from". I created a UserGroup named "
> super.users" that contains a user named "root" and a single rule that
> allows
> access from ANY location. However, when I simulate a login with "root"
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/inconsistency-with-%27collect%27-and-the-%27%7C%7C%...
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 14:50:36 -0200
From: "Edson Tirelli" <tirelli(a)post.com>
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Combine DSL and Java Code?
To: "Rules Users List" <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
Message-ID:
<e6dd5ba30711070850u5957090gf0fcb50c7fa5a9a1(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Markus, did you tried:
[consequence][]write {value} to stdout=System.out.println({value});
With the line:
write $item.getMessage() to stdout
[]s
Edson
2007/11/7, Markus Helbig <mhelbig81(a)googlemail.com>:
>
> Hi,
>
> following example:
>
> Item Class:
>
> public class MyItem {
>
> public MyItem() {}
>
> public String getMessage()
> {
> return "Hello World!";
> }
>
> }
>
> DSL:
>
> [condition][]is of type MyItem=MyItem()
> [consequence][]write "{value}" to stdout=System.out.println("{value}");
>
> DSRL File:
>
> rule
> when
> $item: is of type MyItem
> then
> write $item.getMessage() to stdout
> end
>
> Is this "write $item.getMessage() to stdout" possible in any way?
> Currently i'm not able to get it to work ...
>
> Cheers
>
> Markus
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
--
Edson Tirelli
Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
Office: +55 11 3529-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20071107/fb33c17...
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
End of rules-users Digest, Vol 12, Issue 16
*******************************************
16 years, 5 months
How to define Enum in the decision table
by wyf
hi all:
How can I define java Enum In the Excel decision table?
I have a enum like this:
public enum JobStatus {
UNEMPLOYED,EMPLOYED,RETIRED
}
Thanks
tobato
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying attachment(s) is intended only for the use of the intended recipient and may be confidential and/or privileged of Neusoft Group Ltd., its subsidiaries and/or its affiliates. If any reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, unauthorized use, forwarding, printing, storing, disclosure or copying is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail, and delete the original message and all copies from your system. Thank you.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
16 years, 5 months
RE: How to stop firing rules from dependent object
by Sikkandar Nawabjan
Hi,
I have 2 Objects and its corresponding drl/dsls to validate the rule
ObjectA - A.drl,A.dsl
ObjectB - B.drl,B.dsl
when i insert ObjectA i want the rules in A.drl to be fired.
when i insert ObjectB along with ObjectA i want to fire rules only from B.drl
There are some rule in B.drl requires ObjectA.so i need to insert always ObjectA with ObjectB. At the same time i don't want the rule from A.drl
How to do that?
Thanks and Regs,
Basha
16 years, 5 months
inconsistency with 'collect' and the '||' operator
by Adrian Cowham
I'm running into an issue where the || operator embedded in a collect CE
isn't working as expected. The rule I have is
rule Grant Access"
when
$request : AccessRequest($name : username, $ID : sessionID, $loc :
accessLocation, $day : dayOfAccess)
$user : NetworkUser(username == $name)
$group : UserGroup(users contains $user)
$locationRules : ArrayList(size > 0) from
collect (AccessRule((allowedLocation == "ANY" || allowedLocation
== $loc), allowAccess == "false")
from $group.getRules())
then
# access granted
end
The issue I'm having is with AccessRule((allowedLocation == "ANY" ||
allowedLocation == $loc), allowAccess == "false"), this translate to "all
access rules that have the allowed location set to ANY or set to the
location the user is logging in from". I created a UserGroup named "
super.users" that contains a user named "root" and a single rule that allows
access from ANY location. However, when I simulate a login with "root"
16 years, 5 months
Re: [rules-users] Problem running JBRMS 4.0.3 on JBoss AS 4.2.1
by Aziz Boxwala
Fernando,
Did you have an opportunity to look into the issue?
Thanks,
--Aziz
----- Original Message ----
From: Fernando Meyer <fernando(a)fmeyer.org>
To: kissro(a)lidp.com; Rules Users List <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 11:03:59 AM
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Problem running JBRMS 4.0.3 on JBoss AS 4.2.1
Ok guys, Im check this problem at the moment/.
On 10/31/07, kissro(a)lidp.com <kissro(a)lidp.com
> wrote:I think there must be a bug with the 4.0.3 BRMS .war file. I upgraded
to 4.0.3 (including the BRMS .war file) and received the same errors
listed below when tring to login to the BRMS. I then copied the 4.0.1
BRMS .war file to the server/deploy directory and everything works fine.
I also did a scan for 'drools-jbrms*' and deleted all files/folders each
time. All files are version 4.0.3 except for the .war file which is 4.0.1.
Any response from the Drools developers, does the 4.0.3
.war file not
work?
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 07:05:53AM -0700, Aziz Boxwala wrote:
> Switching to AS 4.2.0 may not be an easy option for us. Much of our development
> product development has been done with
4.2.1.
>
> I did not have this problem with BRMS 4.0.0 running on AS 4.2.1.
>
> I should clarify that the exception is thrown when trying to login to the BRMS.
>
> If there is no resolution, is it possible to get to earlier builds (
4.0.0
> latest, or 4.0.1). The downloads page only lists 4.0.3.
>
> Thanks,
> --Aziz
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Aziz
>
> I have/had the same problem under Windows NT. I never received a
> resolution so I just stayed with 4.2.0. It must not work with 4.2.1.
>
> Rod
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 09:27:23AM -0700, Aziz Boxwala wrote:
> > I cannot
> get the BRMS to run on JBoss AS 4.2.1. (on Windows Vista).
> >
> > Any help/hints to fix this will be appreciated. This is the error I get:
> >
> > 12:19:03,577 INFO [STDOUT] ERROR 26-10 12:19:03,576
> > (Contexts.java:flushAndDestroyContexts:335) could not discover
> > transaction status
> > 12:19:03,579 INFO [STDOUT] ERROR 26-10 12:19:03,578
> > (StandardWrapperValve.java:invoke:278
) Servlet.service() for s
> > ervlet default threw exception
> > java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot create a session after the response has
> > been committed
> > at org.apache.catalina.connector.Request.doGetSession
> > (Request.java:2284)
> > at org.apache.catalina.connector.Request.getSession(Request.java:2066)
> > at
> org.apache.catalina.connector.RequestFacade.getSession
> > (
RequestFacade.java:833)
> > at org.jboss.seam.servlet.ServletRequestSessionMap.put
> > (ServletRequestSessionMap.java:87)
> > at org.jboss.seam.servlet.ServletRequestSessionMap.put
> > (ServletRequestSessionMap.java:25)
> > at org.jboss.seam.contexts.BasicContext.set(BasicContext.java:80)
> > at org.jboss.seam.Component.newInstance(Component.java:1980)
> > at org.jboss.seam.Component.getInstance(Component.java:1878)
> > at org.jboss.seam.Component.getInstance(Component.java:1857)
> > at org.jboss.seam.Component.getInstance
(Component.java:1834)
> > at org.jboss.seam.web.Session.getInstance(Session.java:122)
> > at org.jboss.seam.contexts.Contexts.flushAndDestroyContexts
> >
> (Contexts.java:375)
> > at org.jboss.seam.contexts.Lifecycle.endRequest(Lifecycle.java:132)
> > at org.jboss.seam.servlet.ContextualHttpServletRequest.run
> > (ContextualHttpServletRequest.java:65)
> > at org.jboss.seam.web.ContextFilter.doFilter(ContextFilter.java:37)
> > at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter
> > (ApplicationFilterChain.java:235)
> > at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter
> > (ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
> > at org.jboss.web.tomcat.filters.ReplyHeaderFilter.doFilter
> > (
ReplyHeaderFilter.java:96)
> > at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter
> > (ApplicationFilterChain.java:235)
> > at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter
> > (ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
> > at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke
> > (StandardWrapperValve.java:230)
> > at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke
> > (StandardContextValve.java:175)
> > at org.jboss.web.tomcat.security.SecurityAssociationValve.invoke
> > (SecurityAssociationValve.java:179)
> > at org.jboss.web.tomcat.security.JaccContextValve.invoke
> > (JaccContextValve.java:84)
> > at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke
> > (StandardHostValve.java:128)
> > at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke
> > (ErrorReportValve.java:104)
> > at org.jboss.web.tomcat.service.jca.CachedConnectionValve.invoke
> >
> (CachedConnectionValve.java:157)
> > at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke
> > (StandardEngineValve.java:109)
> > at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service
> > (CoyoteAdapter.java:241)
> > at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process
> > (Http11Processor.java:844)
> > at
> > org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process
> > (Http11Protocol.java:580)
> > at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run
> > (JIoEndpoint.java:447)
> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --Aziz
> >
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Fernando Meyer http://fmeyer.org
JBoss Rules Core Developer
fernando(a)fmeyer.org
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
16 years, 5 months
