DroolsFlow 5.1.1 ForEach + XOR/OR Gateway = Impossible?
by Dirk Hermanns
Hi everybody!
I'm struggling with the forEach construct. We already had a Drools Flow
running using Drools 5.0.
Now we would like to port it to Drools Flow 5.1.1.
It seems that there is a problem with the ForEach Construct in combination
with the XOR Gateway (the same
seems to be true for the OR Gateway):
Even if i set both constrains of the gateway to "eval( true )" i got an
runtime Error like (full Stacktrace at the end of my post):
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: XOR split could not find at
least one valid outgoing connection for split Art des Arbeitsanstosses
pruefen
I can even reproduce this behaviour when building a small workflow from
scratch.
Had anyone else such an error? Does anyone know a workaround for this?
You can reproduce this with the attached Flows.
Any help is really appreciated!
Regards,
Dirk Hermanns
P.S.: If i try to build such an Flow using the new bpmn Notation, i get an
error when building the package in Guvnor: Workitem Node xxx has no
incoming connection.
So this doesn't seem to help :(. Has anyone got the forEach (or Multiple
Instances) feature with Drools 5.1.1 working?
org.drools.RuntimeDroolsException: Unexpected exception executing action
org.drools.process.instance.event.DefaultSignalManager$SignalAction@15c90f4
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.executeQueuedActions
(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:1473)
at org.drools.common.DefaultAgenda.fireAllRules
(DefaultAgenda.java:1074)
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.fireAllRules
(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:785)
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.fireAllRules
(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:751)
at
org.drools.process.instance.impl.DefaultWorkItemManager.completeWorkItem
(DefaultWorkItemManager.java:120)
at
de.lvm.vorverteilung.internal.util.VorvertelungsauftragAnalysierenWorkItemHandler.executeWorkItem
(VorvertelungsauftragAnalysierenWorkItemHandler.java:51)
at
org.drools.process.instance.impl.DefaultWorkItemManager.internalExecuteWorkItem
(DefaultWorkItemManager.java:72)
at
org.drools.workflow.instance.node.WorkItemNodeInstance.internalTrigger
(WorkItemNodeInstance.java:101)
at org.drools.workflow.instance.impl.NodeInstanceImpl.trigger
(NodeInstanceImpl.java:117)
at
org.drools.workflow.instance.impl.NodeInstanceImpl.triggerConnection
(NodeInstanceImpl.java:178)
at
org.drools.workflow.instance.impl.NodeInstanceImpl.triggerCompleted
(NodeInstanceImpl.java:144)
at
org.drools.workflow.instance.node.StartNodeInstance.triggerCompleted
(StartNodeInstance.java:49)
at
org.drools.workflow.instance.node.StartNodeInstance.internalTrigger
(StartNodeInstance.java:41)
at org.drools.workflow.instance.impl.NodeInstanceImpl.trigger
(NodeInstanceImpl.java:117)
at org.drools.ruleflow.instance.RuleFlowProcessInstance.internalStart
(RuleFlowProcessInstance.java:32)
at org.drools.process.instance.impl.ProcessInstanceImpl.start
(ProcessInstanceImpl.java:192)
at
org.drools.workflow.instance.impl.WorkflowProcessInstanceImpl.start
(WorkflowProcessInstanceImpl.java:309)
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.startProcess
(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:1644)
at org.drools.impl.StatefulKnowledgeSessionImpl.startProcess
(StatefulKnowledgeSessionImpl.java:306)
at de.lvm.vorverteilung.internal.rules.TerminHRuleFlowTest.runTermin1
(TerminHRuleFlowTest.java:252)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall
(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run
(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively
(FrameworkMethod.java:41)
at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate
(InvokeMethod.java:20)
at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate
(RunBefores.java:28)
at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate
(RunAfters.java:31)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild
(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild
(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:44)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:180)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:41)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:173)
at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate
(RunBefores.java:28)
at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate
(RunAfters.java:31)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:220)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run
(JUnit4TestReference.java:46)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run
(TestExecution.java:38)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests
(RemoteTestRunner.java:467)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests
(RemoteTestRunner.java:683)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run
(RemoteTestRunner.java:390)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main
(RemoteTestRunner.java:197)
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: XOR split could not find at
least one valid outgoing connection for split Art des Arbeitsanstosses
pruefen
at org.drools.workflow.instance.node.SplitInstance.internalTrigger
(SplitInstance.java:92)
at org.drools.workflow.instance.impl.NodeInstanceImpl.trigger
(NodeInstanceImpl.java:117)
at
org.drools.workflow.instance.impl.NodeInstanceImpl.triggerConnection
(NodeInstanceImpl.java:178)
at
org.drools.workflow.instance.impl.NodeInstanceImpl.triggerCompleted
(NodeInstanceImpl.java:144)
at
org.drools.workflow.instance.impl.ExtendedNodeInstanceImpl.triggerCompleted
(ExtendedNodeInstanceImpl.java:53)
at
org.drools.workflow.instance.node.StateBasedNodeInstance.triggerCompleted
(StateBasedNodeInstance.java:117)
at
org.drools.workflow.instance.node.StateBasedNodeInstance.triggerCompleted
(StateBasedNodeInstance.java:98)
at
org.drools.workflow.instance.node.WorkItemNodeInstance.internalTrigger
(WorkItemNodeInstance.java:105)
at org.drools.workflow.instance.impl.NodeInstanceImpl.trigger
(NodeInstanceImpl.java:117)
at
org.drools.workflow.instance.impl.NodeInstanceImpl.triggerConnection
(NodeInstanceImpl.java:178)
at
org.drools.workflow.instance.impl.NodeInstanceImpl.triggerCompleted
(NodeInstanceImpl.java:144)
at
org.drools.workflow.instance.impl.ExtendedNodeInstanceImpl.triggerCompleted
(ExtendedNodeInstanceImpl.java:53)
at
org.drools.workflow.instance.node.StateBasedNodeInstance.triggerCompleted
(StateBasedNodeInstance.java:117)
at
org.drools.workflow.instance.node.StateBasedNodeInstance.triggerCompleted
(StateBasedNodeInstance.java:98)
at org.drools.workflow.instance.node.RuleSetNodeInstance.signalEvent
(RuleSetNodeInstance.java:71)
at
org.drools.workflow.instance.impl.WorkflowProcessInstanceImpl.signalEvent
(WorkflowProcessInstanceImpl.java:343)
at
org.drools.process.instance.event.DefaultSignalManager.internalSignalEvent
(DefaultSignalManager.java:79)
at org.drools.process.instance.event.DefaultSignalManager
$SignalAction.execute(DefaultSignalManager.java:167)
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.executeQueuedActions
(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:1471)
... 43 more
(See attached file: ZZTestFlow2.rf)(See attached file: ZZTestFlow.bpmn)
15 years, 7 months
Drools 4.0, Support for multiple pattern in accumulate source pattern
by Juergen
It appears as if accumulate does support only a single pattern CE as
source pattern, e.g.:
Number() from accumulate(
Cheese(
price : price
),
sum( price )
)
Is it possible to have more than one pattern in the source pattern, e.g.:
Number() from accumulate(
Cheese(
price : price,
type : type
)
Person(
favouriteCheese == type,
age > 30
),
sum( price )
)
The same could be said for collect, but there the problem to specify
which item of a matching tuple is to be collected, but this could be
handled recreating collect via accumulate, e.g.:
Collection() from accumulate(
cheese : Cheese(
type : type
)
Person(
favouriteCheese == type,
age > 30
),
collect( cheese )
)
15 years, 7 months
How to use a result of custom defined function in WHEN part?
by AleBu
Hi,
I am new to Drools and do some experiments on it, and encountered on a
problem which can't solve for a last few days, so maybe someone can explain
what I am doing wrong?
I will probably explain my problem with example. Lets say we have a
collection of letters like 'a', 'b', 'c', 'a', 'd', 'e', 'c'. And I want to
report all letters that are duplicated, but only once providing a number of
duplication. In other words, for each letter which is duplicated I need to
do a report by saying 'Letter X is duplicated N times.
My idea was to create cardinality collection for letters which is a
collection of POJOs Tuple where first is letter and second is cound (first
and second are properties). I created a function for it createCardinality(
Collection letters ) which returns such cardinality info and tried something
like:
when
Something( $letters: collectionOfLetters )
Tuple( $letter: first, $count: second > 1 ) from collect( Tuple() from
createCardinality( $letters ) )
then
System.out.println( "Letter "+letter+" is duplicated "+$count+"
times" )
But I am reported (at least it looks like this) about the problems with my
function createCardinality(). Maybe I misunderstood something about usage of
FROM?
--
View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-use-a-result-o...
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
15 years, 7 months
Compound DSL statements
by Chris Selwyn
I tried creating a DSL something like the following:-
[when] there is a QQ with attr equal to {YYY} = there is a Q - with attr
equal to {YYY}
[when]there is a Q = Question()
[when] - with attr equal to {YYY} = attr == "{YYY}"
but I find that the expansion does not seem to work right.
When I use this like
when
there is a QQ with attr equal to abc
then
...
What this expands to is
Question() attr == "abc"
I was hoping that the condition would be put inside the pattern.
Is it not possible to make "compound" DSL statements that use inline "-"
clauses?
Chris Selwyn
15 years, 7 months
rulebase configuration Options
by Kumar, Ravendra
Hi Guys,
I am trying to find out more information about rulebase configuration
options written in "drools.default.rulebase.conf"
Do any of you guys know any blog or material written on these options,
If someone has written any blog on these options, and could I know the
location, it will a great help.
Thanks,
Rav.
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of
rules-users-request(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: 17 December 2010 08:57
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: rules-users Digest, Vol 49, Issue 44
Send rules-users mailing list submissions to
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
rules-users-request(a)lists.jboss.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
rules-users-owner(a)lists.jboss.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of rules-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: "Negative" Rules (Ansgar Konermann)
2. Re: Using GlobalArea in Guvnor (Jervis Liu)
3. Re: Guvnor with JBoss AS on Ubuntu (alim)
4. Re: Deploying Guvnor 5.1 on Glassfish v3 (alim)
5. DroolsFlow 5.1.1 ForEach + XOR/OR Gateway = Impossible?
(Dirk Hermanns)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:34:11 +0100
From: Ansgar Konermann <ansgar.konermann(a)googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: [rules-users] "Negative" Rules
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Message-ID: <4D0AA1F3.20307(a)googlemail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
On 15.12.2010 10:01, Diego San Esteban wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> How is itpossible to implement a "rollback"in theKB?
>
> Suppose that when retracting a fact,I want toundo the changes
made.
>
A very simple, yet effective solution would be to exclusively use
insertLogical(). No updates to facts which are already asserted, no
normal "insert".
Best regards
Ansgar
15 years, 7 months
activation-group issue
by Yaniv Itzhaki
Hi,
I have a group of rules with salience which I would like that only the first
activated rule will fire.
I cant use the activation-group attribute because each rule can fire number
of times, and i want only this rule to be fired in that group:
rule "A1"
salience 100
ruleflow-group "A"
activation-group "A"
when
xxx1
then
yyy1
end
rule "A2"
salience 90
ruleflow-group "A"
activation-group "A"
when
xxx2
then
yyy2
end
If Rule A1 run (activated number of times), rule A2 should not run.
Is there a way to do that? (no global flags etc.)
Thanks
Yaniv
15 years, 7 months
"Negative" Rules
by Diego San Esteban
Greetings,
How is it possible to implement a "rollback" in the KB?
Suppose that when retracting a fact, I want to undo the changes made.
Writing a negative (opposite) rule isn't efficient, it means declaring the
rule twice effectively. Also the negative rule is usually using lots of OR's
and NOT's which isn't fast.
Any help?
Thanks
15 years, 7 months
return value restriction: not all expressions supported?
by Wolfgang Laun
Using 5.1.1 and knowing that "a Return Value restriction is a parenthesized
expression composed from literals, any valid Java primitive or object,
previously bound variables, function calls, and operators" I wrote
OperatorOrder( $code: code, $id1: elId1, $id2: elId2 )
CommandCode( code == $code, operands != ( $id1!=null ? ($id2!=null ? 2 :
1) : 0 ) )
and got the erroneous error message:
Rule Compilation error : [Rule name='operator command: invalid number of
elements']
appl/domain/element/Rule_operator_command__invalid_number_of_elements_0.java
(9:714) : $id2 cannot be resolved
Variations in the return value restriction show that it is the nesting of
-?-:- which causes the bug; a similar (but not equivalent) expression
operands != ( ($id1!=null ? 1:0) + ($id2!=null ? 1:0) )
is accepted.
-W
15 years, 7 months
