How to say that two events have to happen during the same time interval
by Tina Vießmann
Hi,
I'm trying to find a easy way to express that two events A and B have to
happen during the same time interval. The events have each a duration >
0.
A example condition could be: The event A and B have to happen during the
same 60 seconds.
For me it includes several possibilites:
* A can start before B and
~ end before B starts
~ end during B
~ end after B ends
* The same can be possible for B
* A and B start/end/both at the same time
In any case the maximum duration from the first start time to the last end
time is e.g. 60s.
Is there a easy way to express that. I can only think of specifying the
several possibilities as conditions.
Thank you! :)
Tina
15 years, 2 months
Finding the approver for an employee (1) Is this a good problem for rules? (2) How you would do it?
by dc tech
(Note: This was cross-posted earlier to the Jess User Group as well)
We wrote code to solve this problem (described later) many years ago, when I
was not aware of rule based approaches. However, I wonder if a rules based
solution might represent a better approach to solve this problem... and if
so, how would one do it?
*BACKGROUND*
We have departments setup in a hierarchical structure (i.e. parent
departments)
An employee can belong to one and only one department.
An employee can be the manager of one or more departments; a manager may
or not belong to that department.
A department can have many employees and many managers.
*PROBLEM*
Find the approver for an employee's expenses.
An approver is a 'higher level' manager relative to employee in the
organizational hierarchy.
Note that since the manager is employee as well, this includes the problem
of finding the manager of a manager.
*RULES*
1. The approver the nearest manager to the employee (traversing up the
department hierarchy)
Typical cases then are:
- for a non-manager employee, the approver is the manager of the employee's
department
- for a manager who manages a single department and belongs to that
department, the approver is the manager of the parent unit
2. The approver for a manager cannot the manager himself or a peer manager
(in the same department).
3. An approver cannot report to the employee
This sometimes happens when the manager is an employee in one department but
manager for a department a few levels up in the hierarchy
3a. An approver cannot be the peer to someone who reports to the manager
*SAMPLE DATA*
A (manager Hillary)
A1 (manager John and Jane )
A11
A12 (manager Mike; employees John and Mike)
A13
A2 (manager Kate)
A21 (manager Jessica, employee Janet)
A22 (manager Erica, employee Jane)
1. Approver for Janet is Jessica
2. Approver for Jessica is Kate
3.Approver for John is Hillary (cannot be Mike, John himself or Jane)
4. Approver for Jane is Erica via A22 (no reporting relationship).
*ALGORITHMIC SOLUTION*
Define the department reporting vector starting from the employee
department
e.g. for (1) it would be A21 -> A2 -> A and
for (3) it would be A12 -> A1 -> A
Then for each, define managers and then employees
(1) : A21( jessica/ janet ) -> A2: ( Kate) -> A( Hillary)
(2): A12 (Mike/ John, Mike) -> A1 (John, Jane) -> A (Hillary)
Then starting from the top (i.e. A), move down looking for the employee (in
manager or employee list)
If the employee is found in the manager list, approver is the manager of
the parent department
If the employee is found in the employee list, the approver is the manager
of this unit (not the parent)
(I may have missed a few rules in the algorithmic solution)
*RULE BASED SOLUTION?*
Is this a good problem for rule bases solution?
I started to model this and will post my solution if I can come up with
something useful but would absolutely welcome your inputs.
15 years, 2 months
Drl to Xml conversion
by ADITYA CHITRE
Hi,
I am trying to convert a drl file to an xml file using drool xml language. In there a way to convert the drool fusion operators (temporal) from the drl file to an xml equivalent? For eg. the time information (3m30s, 4m) in the fusion temporal operator "before[ 3m30s, 4m ]" is being ignored when the xml conversion is done. Is it possible to preserve this time information using xml drool api's?
Regards,
Aditya
15 years, 2 months
Re: [rules-users] Using GlobalArea in Guvnor
by John Peterson
>Message: 7
>Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:48:21 -0700
>From: "John Peterson" <john.peterson.gv3k(a)statefarm.com>
>Subject: [rules-users] Using GlobalArea in Guvnor
>To: <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
>Message-ID:
>
<D3A6E68928C9104BB815C83F43A36BDF0EF4EA42(a)WPSCV6NH.OPR.STATEFARM.ORG>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
>Hi,
>
>I'm working with Guvnor 5.1.1 and I'm having an issue accessing
>Declarative Models defined in the Global Area in the Packages. Is it
>possible to create a shared model in the Global Area and then write
>rules against them in other packages? It would seem to me that the
>answer would be yes (why else have a "Global" area), but, for some
>reason, it doesn't seem to recognize them.
>
>Here's a scenario:
>
>I declare a DeclarativeModel in GlobalArea:
>
>GenericFact
> id: Integer
> valueOne: Integer
> label: String
>end
>
>I have a package called com.experiment. I'd like to write Business
Rule
>in it using that GenericFact. However, when I click the "+" sign to
add
>a Fact, I see a yellow background over "Note: No model has been
>defined." Is there something that needs to be done to make the
>GlobalArea stuff viewable from the individual packages?
Follow-up from last Friday: I have not been able to figure out this
situation.
It would appear that I am supposed to "import" my model from my Global
Area into my other packages for use, but whenever I create "New
declarative model" or "Upload POJO Model jar" and then select "Import
asset from global area", there's nothing in the drop down for "Asset to
import". I have 2 Model assets in the global area - one a POJO, the
other a Declarative model. Is there something that needs to be done to
make these "visible" to the other packages? I can't find anything in
the documentation about it.
15 years, 2 months
Problems with BigDecimal on LHS
by Jason Mihalick
I searched on the forum before I posted this and looked in JIRA. It appears
that all problems like this with BigDecimal are thought to be resolved.
However, I am having a problem that appears it may be attributed to Drools
using the BigDecimal( double ) constructor when converting decimal numbers
in the rules to a BigDecimal.
If you are able to reproduce this problem, what is the work around? Use an
eval statement?
The rule does not fire in the following test:
package org.test;
import java.math.BigDecimal;
import org.drools.KnowledgeBase;
import org.drools.builder.KnowledgeBuilder;
import org.drools.builder.KnowledgeBuilderFactory;
import org.drools.builder.ResourceType;
import org.drools.io.ResourceFactory;
import org.drools.runtime.StatelessKnowledgeSession;
public class BigDTest {
public final static String RULE =
"package mypackage; " +
"import org.test.BigDTest;" +
"rule \"BigDecimal compare problem\" " +
" when " +
" BigDTest( bigDValue == 6.3 ) " +
" then " +
" System.out.println( \"Matched!\" ); " +
" end"
;
private BigDecimal bigDValue = new BigDecimal( "6.3" ) ; // Rule will fire
if this is changed to BigDecimal( 6.3 )
public BigDecimal getBigDValue() {
return bigDValue;
}
public void setBigDValue( BigDecimal bigDValue ) {
this.bigDValue = bigDValue;
}
public static void main( String[] args ) {
KnowledgeBuilder kbuilder =
KnowledgeBuilderFactory.newKnowledgeBuilder();
kbuilder.add( ResourceFactory.newByteArrayResource( RULE.getBytes() ),
ResourceType.DRL );
if ( kbuilder.hasErrors() ) {
System.err.println( kbuilder.getErrors().toString() );
}
KnowledgeBase kbase = kbuilder.newKnowledgeBase();
StatelessKnowledgeSession ksession =
kbase.newStatelessKnowledgeSession();
BigDTest bigDTest = new BigDTest();
ksession.execute( bigDTest );
}
}
--
View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Problems-with-BigDeci...
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
15 years, 2 months
Re: [rules-users] Guvnor - archival option
by Rob Fisher
After further review, I discovered that the rule I was trying to create
did indeed exist in the archival section. I deleted it and was able to
then create the rule with the preferred name.
Sorry to send you on a wild goose chase. I'm very new to this. Every
day is a learning experience.
Rob
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 12:03:10 +0800
From: Jervis Liu <jliu(a)redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Guvnor - archival option
To: Rules Users List <rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
Message-ID: <4D2A84FE.8060805(a)redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 2011/1/6 22:39, Rob Fisher wrote:
> I'm using version 5.1.1
>
> I can't find any reference to the rule anywhere in the package, yet it
> seems to be seeing it when trying to create a rule with the same name.
>
Hi, I verified guvnor 5.1.1, still can not reproduce the problem you
reported. If you believe you still have this problem, you can send me a
repository dump with detailed instruction on how to reproduce so that I
can take a further look. Thanks.
Cheers,
Jervis
> Rob Fisher
> Systems Analyst, Agency Awards
> Desk 309-735-4136
> Cell 309-660-4957
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
> [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Jervis Liu
> Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 1:58 AM
> To: Rules Users List
> Subject: Re: [rules-users] Guvnor - archival option
>
> What version of Guvnor are you using? I am not able to reproduce this
> problem on trunk.
>
> Thanks,
> Jervis
>
> Rob Fisher wrote:
>>
>> I archived a rule, then deleted it within Administration\Archive
>> (using the "Delete selected asset" option). However, when trying to
>> create a rule with the same name, I receive the following message:
>> "An
>
>> asset with that name already exists in the chosen package. Please use
>> another name". I do not see the rule under Archive any longer (since
>> it was deleted). It seems, however, to still be recognized within the
>> repository.
>>
>> Anyone know how to solve this?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Rob Fisher**
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -
>> --
Rob Fisher
15 years, 2 months
process-designer deserialization error
by AlfredoLatini
Hi,
i have a problem with oryx process-designer and drools guvnor. I have
created a process with process-designer and i saved it. Then i have opened
this file with eclipse and i uploaded this file in guvnor repository.
I have opened the process in drools guvnor and the following exception
occurred:
The server encountered an internal error () that prevented it from
fulfilling this request.</u></p><p>exception
<pre>javax.servlet.ServletException:
http://localhost:8080/designer/bpmn2_0deserialization
org.drools.guvnor.server.GuvnorAPIServlet.service(GuvnorAPIServlet.java:73)
javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:803)
org.jboss.seam.web.ContextFilter$1.process(ContextFilter.java:42)
How can i fix this problem?
My jboss installation runs on port 8580 because 8080 is busy (oracleXE).
Thanks in advance
Alfredo.
--
View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/process-designer-dese...
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
15 years, 2 months
Not able to achieve NOT & FROM keyword in a brl through Guvnor
by Harshit Bapna
Hello All,
>From the Expert documentation, I am trying to create the rule(below) in
Guvnor
Guvnor Version : 5.1.1
I am not able to build a rule which has 'from' keyword. Is it supported in
Guvnor ?
Also I am not able to achieve the combination of NOT & FROM in a business
rule.
Is it possible ?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
package org.drools;
rule "Avoid NPE on wrong syntax"
when
not( Cheese( ( type == "stilton" && price == 10 ) || ( type == "brie"
&& price == 15 ) ) from $cheeseList )
then
System.out.println("OK");
end
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15 years, 2 months
