5th International Workshop on Event-Driven Business Process Management (edBPM 2011) collocated with BPM 2011
by Adrian Paschke
Apologies for cross-posting...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Due to numerous requests we decided to extend the deadline for the
5th International Workshop on Event-Driven Business Process Management,
edBPM 2011 collocated with the BPM 2011 conference to May 27, 2011.
http://icep-edbpm11.fzi.de
=====================================================================
Dear colleagues (with apologies for cross-posting),
you are invited to submit papers for the 5th International Workshop on
Event-Driven Business Process Management to be held alongside the Busines
Process Management Conference on August 29th 2011 in Clermont-Ferrand,
France
<Event-Driven Business Process Management> (EDBPM) is an enhancement of
Business Process Management (BPM) by new concepts of Service Oriented
Architecture (SOA), Event Driven Architecture (EDA), Software as a Service
(SaaS), Business Activity Monitoring (BAM) and Complex Event Processing
(CEP). In this context, BPM means a software platform which provides
companies the ability to model, manage, and optimize these processes for
significant gain. As an independent system, CEP is a parallel running
platform that analyses and processes events. The BPM- and the CEP-platform
correspond via events which are produced by the BPM-workflow engine and by
the - if distributed -- IT services which are associated with the business
process steps. Also events coming from different event sources in different
forms can trigger a business process or influence the execution of the
process or a service, which can result in another event. Even more, the
correlation of these events in a particular context can be treated as a
complex, business level event, relevant for the execution of other business
processes or services closing the loop of insight-to-action. A business
process - arbitrarily fine or coarse grained - can be seen as a service
again and can be "choreographed" with other business processes or services,
even between different enterprises and organisations.
Loosely coupled event-driven architecture for BPM provides important
benefits:
. Responsiveness. Events can occur at any time from any source and processes
respond to them immediately, whenever they happen and wherever they happen.
. Agility. New processes can be modeled, implemented, deployed, and
optimized more quickly in response to changing business requirements.
. Flexibility. Processes can span heterogeneous platforms and programming
languages. Participating applications can be upgraded or changed without
breaking the process model.
TOPICS
Authors are invited to submit novel contributions in the above mentioned
problem domain. Specifically, the relevant topics include, but are not
limited to:
. Event-driven BPM: Concepts
e.g. role of event processing in BPM, business events: types and
representation, vent stream processing in business processes, process event
processing in CEP, data- and event-driven business processes, event and
process interaction patterns
. Design-time CEP and BPM
e.g. modelling modelling events in human-oriented tasks,
semantics/ontologies for event-driven BPM, BPMN and event processing,
interaction modelling of process model and event processing network.
. Run-time CEP and BPM
e.g. event pattern detection, BPEL and event processing, reasoning about
unknown/ similar events
. Applications/ Use use cases for event-driven BPM
e.g. event-driven monitoring/ BAM , event-driven SLA monitoring,
context-aware BPM
The Workshop is planned as a full-day event, including a keynote, paper
presentations, lightning talks, demos, posters, and a moderated, open
discussion with the clear goal of agreeing upon a research roadmap for
event-driven Business Process Management research, by taking into account
new challenges, described earlier.
SUBMISSION
The following types of submission are solicited:
. Long paper submissions, describing substantial contributions of novel
ongoing work. Long papers should be at most 12 pages long.
. Short paper submissions, describing work in progress. These papers should
be at most 6 pages long.
. Use case submissions, describing results from an edBPM use case. These
papers should be at most 4 pages long.
Papers should be submitted in the new LNBIP format
(http://www.springer.com/computer/lncs?SGWID=0-164-7-487211-0). Papers have
to present original research contributions not concurrently submitted
elsewhere. The title page must contain a short abstract, a classification of
the topics covered, preferably using the list of topics above, and an
indication of the submission category (Long Paper/ Short Paper / Use case).
Papers can be uploaded via the workshop page on easychair, the address can
be found on the workshop homepage.
Papers will be published in the postconference proceeding (Springer Verlag)
IMPORTANT DATES
Deadline paper submissions: May 27, 2011 (extended deadline)
Notification of acceptance: June 9, 2011
Camera-ready papers: June 17, 2011
Workshops: August 29, 2011
ORGANISING COMMITTEE:
Dr. Nenad Stojanovic
FZI - Research Center for Information Technologies at the University of
Karlsruhe
Germany
Nenad.Stojanovic(a)fzi.de
Dr. Opher Etzion
Senior Technical Staff Member, Master Inventor
Event Processing Scientific Leader
IBM Research Lab in Haifa
OPHER(a)il.ibm.com
Prof. Dr. Adrian Paschke
Corporate Semantic Web, Free University Berlin, Germany and
RuleML Inc., Canada
paschke(a)inf-fu-berlin.de
Dr. Christian Janiesch
Senior Researcher
SAP Research Center Brisbane
Australia
Christianc.Janiesch(a)sap.com
Additional information
A complete overview about relevant topics, detailed workshop information and
contact addresses can be found on the workshop website
http://icep-edbpm11.fzi.de
--------------------------------------------------------
15 years, 3 months
Unable to create DSL properly?
by boy18nj
I'm trying to create DSL and DSLR out of DRL but so far unsuccessfull with
this small example-
DRL (Working OK)-
#created on: Apr 30, 2011
package com.fire
#list any import classes here.
import com.fire.*;
#declare any global variables here
rule "When there is a fire turn on the sprinkler"
when
#conditions
Fire( $room : room )
$sprinkler : Sprinkler( room == $room, on == false )
then
#actions
modify($sprinkler){setOn(true)};
System.out.println( "Turn on the sprinkler for room " + $room.getName() );
end
DSL-
[condition][]There is fire in "{room}"=Fire( "{room}" : room )
[condition][]"{sprinkler}" is in same "{room}" and sprinkler is
"{off}"="{sprinkler}" : Sprinkler( room == "{room}", on == "{off}" )
[consequence][]Turn on the "{sprinkler}"=modify("{sprinkler}"){setOn(true)};
DSLR- (Error message when compiling mismatched input)
#created on: Apr 30, 2011
package com.fire
expander fireAlarm.dsl
#list any import classes here.
import com.fire.*;
rule "When there is a fire turn on the sprinkler"
when
#conditions
There is fire in "{room}"
"{sprinkler}" is in same "{room}" and sprinkler is "{off}"
then
#actions
Turn on the "{sprinkler}"
log;
end
Can somebody point out what I am doing wrong?
--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Unable-to-create-DSL-properly-tp2901873...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
15 years, 3 months
Question on modeling facts
by Brett Bergquist
I am trying to write rules to distill down a minimal train schedule from a
set of overlapping train schedules. A train schedule contains a train
identifier, a schedule that it runs on, and a set of train stops. A rule
that I would like to write is to combine one or more train schedules if more
than one train runs on the same day (ie has the same schedule) and stops at
the same stops. This ignores the train identifier and will discard all
other train schedules that have a different train identifier but have the
same schedule and stops.
I am wondering how to model the equality test for the same set of stops.
Can I have my Train fact contain a collection of stops and then compare the
collections for equality? Will this be efficient? Is there a better way to
model this?
Any and all help will be greatly appreciated.
Brett
--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Question-on-modeling-facts-tp2895595p28...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
15 years, 3 months
Fw: Regarding Drools - Expert and Fusion
by Sumeet Karawal
Hi ,
I had posted this earlier :
" Could somebody please let me know about any link or document for Best
Practices regarding JBoss Rules(Expert) and Fusion.
Also any link or document regarding Technical Architecture of JBoss Rules
(Expert) and JBoss Fusion Stack. "
Also I have a query as how can Drools - Expert and Fusion coexist in an
Application. I have just started learning about Drools Fusion.
What can qualify to go as a event driven system as opposed to rules
based system ?
It would be very helpful if somebody could let me know about the few
things.
Thanks & Regards,
Sumeet Karawal
Mailto: sumeet.karawal(a)tcs.com
From: Sumeet Karawal/MUM/TCS
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Date: 05/03/2011 07:09 PM
Subject: Regarding Drools - Expert and Fusion
Hi,
Could somebody please let me know about any link or document for Best
Practices regarding JBoss Rules(Expert) and Fusion.
Also any link or document regarding Technical Architecture of JBoss Rules
(Expert) and JBoss Fusion Stack.
Thanks & Regards,
Sumeet Karawal
Mailto: sumeet.karawal(a)tcs.com
=====-----=====-----=====
Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
message and/or attachments to it may contain
confidential or privileged information. If you are
not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
review, distribution, printing or copying of the
information contained in this e-mail message
and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If
you have received this communication in error,
please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and
immediately and permanently delete the message
and any attachments. Thank you
15 years, 3 months
Drools-Persistence with pessimistic transaction locking?
by Stephan.Koops＠We4IT.com
Hi,
as far as I have seen drools JPA persistence uses optimistic transactions.
Is this required for drools? Or can I switch to locking based
transactions? (Mayby I missed some documentation.)
If someone have a good pointer how to do that, that would be the very
best.
Mit freundlichen Grüssen/Best regards
i. A.
Stephan Koops
Software Engineer
We4IT GmbH
*****************************************************
Veranstaltungen mit We4IT:
10.-12.05.2011 - Lotus Alliance Days in Hamburg, Frankfurt und München
Social Business und aktuelle Roadmaps zu Lotus-Produkten kompakt an einem Tag präsentiert.
http://www.we4it.com/aktuelles/events/365-lotus-alliance-days-10-bis-12-m...
18.5. bis 20.05.2011 - DNUG Frühjahrskonferenz in Bonn
LOTUS ALLIANCE Day im Rahmen der DNUG Frühjahrskonferenz in Bonn.
Erleben Sie spannende Vorträge die über den Tellerrand hinausreichen und erweitern Sie Ihren Horizont.
http://www.we4it.com/aktuelles/events/362-dnug-vom-18-20-mai.html
*****************************************************
We4IT GmbH
Technologiepark 11
33100 Paderborn
Tel: +49 5251 / 70993 - 24
Fax: +49 5251 / 70993 - 01
Mobil:
E-Mail: stephan.koops(a)we4it.com
Internet: http://www.we4it.com
HRB 20740, Amtsgericht Bremen
Geschäftsführer: Stefan Sucker, Vicente Diaz Fernandez
USt.-ID.-Nr. DE 220 859 831
Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich und ausschließlich für die adressierte Person und/oder Organisation bestimmt. Vertrauliche und/oder spezifische Informationen können hierin enthalten sein. Falls Sie ein nicht beabsichtigter Empfänger dieser Nachricht sind, sind das Kopieren, Verteilen und/oder das Aufnehmen aus dem Inhalt resultierender Handlungen untersagt. Haben Sie diese Nachricht fehlerhaft und/oder unvollständig erhalten, benachrichtigen Sie uns bitte umgehend unter unseren oben genannten Kontaktmöglichkeiten.
This message is confidential and intended solely for the person or organization to which it is addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not copy, distribute or take any action on reliance on it. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at the above address.
15 years, 3 months
Deactivating ruleflow-group in AgendaFilter to prevent looping in stateless session
by drdaveg
I have a stateless session with a large number of rules most of which set
values used elsewhere in the application so looping is a big issue. The
rules have been organized into a ruleflows in order to foster orchestration.
As a very clean approach to avoid looping (i.e., avoiding adding control to
rules) I added an AgendaFilter that tracks the rules that have been fired.
Several previous posts discuss that using AgendaFilter's prohibit a
ruleflow-group with no activations being detected. Conversely, the API for
(de)activating a ruleflow-group seems gone; what is the best way of changing
the ruleflow-group from the current group to the one that should execute
next (i.e., the next one in the ruleflow)?
--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Deactivating-ruleflow-group-in-AgendaFi...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
15 years, 3 months
Looping through a vector object in a rule
by sdinoo
I am new to drools
I am inserting into a ksession a single claim POJO + vector of previous
claims
Like this
ksession.insert(claim); // single claim
ksession.insert(historyClaims); // vector of claims
ksession.startProcess("com.dur.claim");
ksession.fireAllRules();
I want to compare single claim variable values with all the claims in the
vector
how do I loop through the vector objects and compare the values in the Rule
(.drl) file?
Can someone help me out?
--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Looping-through-a-vector-object-in-a-ru...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
15 years, 3 months
