August 2011 - rules-users - Jboss List Archives

Drools server and knowledge agent functionality

by Manuel Ortiz

Hello everybody: I am taking a look at Drools Integration documentation to understand how Drools server works and how can be used, and have a doubt concerning, let's say... 'KnowledgeAgent capabilities'. Does Drools server support on the fly rule updating as when using KnowledgeAgent to create KnowledgeBase objects? If it does, where can be configured 'KnowledgeAgent related' properties such as newInstance or resource scanner interval? Thank you in advance for your time. Kind regards, Manuel Ortiz.

12 years, 10 months

5
6
0 / 0

Question about custom accumulation functions

by Bruno Freudensprung

Hi, While testing my custom accumulation function I noticed an unexpected behavior (th'ats of course a personal point of view). It seems that Drools 5.1 calls accumulate(...) and getResult(...) as many times as the number of accumulated facts (accumulate, getResult, accumulate, getResult, etc...). Is it supposed to work like this? Best regards, Bruno.

12 years, 10 months

4
11
0 / 0

Dependency enumeration

by agarwalk

Hi I have created following enumeration and java class file. *Enumeration:* 'OrderData.propertyState':(new com.asps.rules.OrderData()).loadStates() 'OrderData.fulfillmentReviewerName[propertyState]':'(new com.asps.rules.OrderData()).loadReviewers("@{propertyState}")' *Java class:* public class OrderData implements Serializable { private String propertyState; private String fulfillmentReviewerName; // getters and setters public List<String> loadStates() { List<String> states = new ArrayList<String>(); states.add("CA"); states.add("NY"); states.add("FL"); return states; } public List<String> loadReviewers(final String propertyState) { List<String> reviewers = new ArrayList<String>(); System.out.println("### in load reviewers ### : " + propertyState); if ("CA".equalsIgnoreCase(propertyState)) { reviewers.add("A"); reviewers.add("B"); System.out.println("Reviewers : A & B"); } else if ("NY".equalsIgnoreCase(propertyState)) { reviewers.add("C"); reviewers.add("D"); System.out.println("Reviewers : C& D"); } else if ("FL".equalsIgnoreCase(propertyState)) { reviewers.add("E"); reviewers.add("F"); System.out.println("Reviewers : E& F"); } else { reviewers.add("G"); reviewers.add("H"); System.out.println("Reviewers : G& H"); } return reviewers; } } I created a rule as follows WHEN There is an OrderData with: propertyState[propertyState]* FL* --- This is a drop down which is being displayed correctly fulfillmentReviewerName [fulfillmentReviewerName] -- This should have been the drop down. Values are dependent on the state selected. When i try to create above rule the enumeration is loaded correctly for propertyState but the enumeration is not loaded for fulfillmentReviewerName field. When I saw the logs the correct method and condition is being invoked (as per Sys out)but drop down does not contain anything. ANy suggestions? -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Dependency-enumeration-tp3245703p324570... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

12 years, 11 months

3
3
0 / 0

How to the set "drools.dialect.mvel.strict" using Drools+Spring?

by Nicolás Sanchez

Hi, I am using Drools 5.2.0.CR1 and I am using Drools+String to instantiate my drools session. I would like to know how can I set the drools.dialect.mvel.strict property using Spring. Any help would be great! -- Nicolás Sanchez

12 years, 11 months

4
10
0 / 0

how to debug rules in JBoss AS?

by Marina

Hello, I know one can debug rules (put breakpoints in .drl and ruleflow files) when running/debugging an application as a Drools Application. However, I would like to debug rules when my application is running in JBoss AS - just like we do a normal debugging of a Remote application running in a different JVM ,by enabling the JDWP on the server (-Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket,address=8787,server=y,suspend=n) and then connecting to the specified port. Basically, I would like to be able to debug both my Java classes and rules together. Is it possible? thanks, Marina

13 years, 1 month

3
3
0 / 0

Fire Rule in Stateless Knowledge Session

by snehils

Hi, I am new in Drools. I am using Drools version 5.1.0 My requirement is kind of request response, where I have to perform some checks for the request and respond the result. Hence, I decided to go with stateless knowledge session. I have prepared .DRL file and it contains set of rules. When some request receives I have to identify the rule(s) belongs to that request and then fire the rule(s). I am not able to figure out how to categories the rules request wise in DRL file? Also, how to fire only those rules which belongs to the category. For example, there are three kinds of requests Rq1, Rq2 and Rq3. There are rules in DRL file: R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5. R1, R2 belongs to Rq1, R3 belongs to Rq2 and R4, R5 belongs to Rq3. When some request receives only its belonging rules should be fired. For example, on receiving of Rq2 only R3 should be fired. Please provide me some code snipped or link. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Fire-Rule-in-Stateless-Knowledge-Sessio... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

13 years, 2 months

5
11
0 / 0

"Rule-Id" for a Drools Rule

by harishtejwani

All: We are using Drools to detect specific events/conditions in our system. In the 'then' condition of Drools rule, we would like to persist the "Rule Id" of the rule that created the specific event/condition This is because all our reporting is based on "rules" as filters, where users can look at exceptions by specific rules. Is there a suggestion or sample as how can the "Rule Id" be persisted or indicated in the then condition that is immutable or can be long-lived. The current approach of using Rule Name itself as the ID is brittle as this can be changed and suddenly all reports would break. If we assign ID's to rules, where do we keep the mapping of RULE ID to Rules. If we store rules in GUVRNOR is there a way we can get Rule Id's for Rules? Best regards Harish Tejwani -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Rule-Id-for-a-Drools-Rule-tp2914385p291... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

13 years, 4 months

6
13
0 / 0

FW: Implementation of expert system

by Binyala, Krishna Gopal IN BLR SISL

Hello, I am new to drools community... I want to develop an expert system for medical application using drools. can you please let me know how to use history data in drools... Because as far as i know we have to keep all the data in the working memory to access. How should i implement such system? Would be better if you can provide some reference to existing expert system implemented using drools. Thanks in advance. Krishna Gopal In three words I can sum up everything I've learned about life: it goes on... Important notice:This e-mail and any attachment thereto contains corporate proprietary information. If you have received it by mistake, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and delete this e-mail and its attachments from your system. Thank You.

13 years, 7 months

8
11
0 / 0

Re: [rules-users] Question about Drools Spring, StatelessKnowledgeSession and globals

by Patrick van Kann

Hello fellow Droolers, A while ago I asked why the <drools:batch> element seemed to work differently in the case of a StatelessKnowledgeSession and a StatefulKnowedgeSession (see below). I just wanted to update those interested with the answer and ask some further questions, probably aimed at any developers who happen to be reading. I checked out the 5.1.1.34858 tag and had a look at how the Spring integration works. I found that the reason that the global is not set in the case of a StatelessKnowledgeSession is because the <spring:batch> element is effectively ignored in the StatelessKnowledgeSessionBeanFactory, which lacks the following code present in the StatefulKnowledgeSessionBeanFactory (in the internalAfterPropertiesSet() method): if ( getBatch() != null && !getBatch().isEmpty()) { for ( Command<?> cmd : getBatch() ) { ksession.execute( cmd ); } } So, either by accident or design the <spring:batch> element has no effect when using a StatelessKnowledgeSession (but is perfectly allowable in the XSD/Spring namespace). So my questions are: 1) Is this the intended behaviour or a bug? On reflection, I am now not sure the idea of a "batch/script" makes sense for a StatelessKnowledgeSession since execute() is a one-shot method and any globals set this way would not be available to later executions, which is what I was looking for. 2) If so, should the XSD be changed to disallow the batch element within a stateless session (difficult, given that this is determined via the "type" attribute) or should the documentation simply warn people that the <spring:batch> element doesn't do anything if you set the type attribute to stateless (somewhat confusing, I suppose) 3) If not, should the code above be added to the StatelessKnowledgeSessionBeanFactory.internalAfterPropertiesSet() method? 4) Should there be another way to declare a global that isn't through the batch element (one that would cause globals to be set via the setGlobal(String, Object) method rather than using the SetGlobalCommand via the execute() method. I am happy to try and contribute something along these lines if I can get some guidance as to what was actually intended. Hope this helps and thanks again for Drools. Patrick ===================================== Hello, I've been trying out the Spring integration package in Drools 5.1.1 and it works really well, but I have run into one issue I can't figure out. I've defined 2 knowledge sessions from the same knowledge base in the app context - one stateless, one stateful but otherwise identical. They both refer to a collaborator defined as a bean in the app context which is to be used as a global in my rules. This is just an excerpt of my full Spring context, the kbase definition itself is not an issue. <bean id="applicantDao" class="com.acme.app.dao.impl.ApplicantDaoImpl" /> <drools:ksession id="statelessKSession" type="stateless" name="statelessKSession" kbase="kbase"> <drools:batch> <drools:set-global identifier="applicantDao" ref="applicantDao" /> </drools:batch> </drools:ksession> <drools:ksession id="statefulKSession" type="stateful" name="statefulKSession" kbase="kbase"> <drools:batch> <drools:set-global identifier="applicantDao" ref="applicantDao" /> </drools:batch> </drools:ksession> The issue is that this configuration works for the stateful but not the stateless session, in the sense that the stateful session appears to have a valid reference to the applicantDao object in the Globals object but the stateless session doesn't. <at> Test public void testStatelessGlobal() { Globals globals = statelessKSession.getGlobals(); Object global = globals.get("applicantDao"); Assert.assertNotNull(global); } <at> Test public void testStatefulGlobal() { Globals globals = statefulKSession.getGlobals(); Object global = globals.get("applicantDao"); Assert.assertNotNull(global); } The first test fails (the global variable is null) but the second passes. No errors are thrown by Drools during the setup of the Spring container. What am I doing wrong? Should I be able to define globals in this way for stateless sessions? The XSD seems to indicate this is a valid configuration, but it just doesn't work. Is anyone else working with the Spring integration that can point out my error here? Many thanks, Patrick

13 years, 7 months

2
2
0 / 0

Drools: Using Declared Types in Decision Tables

by David Smith

Hi, I am trying to use a declared type in a decision table but get an "Unable to resolve ObjectType" message. The declared type is in a file types.drl, I have a spreadsheet test.xls that has a Ruleset with an import line for the declared type. Is it possible to reference a declared type from a decision table? Is it possible to declare a type in a decision table? Thanks David

13 years, 7 months

5
4
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

rules-users August 2011