Re: [rules-users] [Drools4]: Filter executed rules by *.drl file

Thanks for your answers. The context fact thing would work, but it is really polluting the rules and makes a lot of unnecessary constraint checks. Furthermore the extends is not implemented in Drools 4 or I am blind (maybe it would be a good idea to switch to drools 5 anyway...). So I think I will go with the one drl per rulebase solution. @manstis: Could you explain why you think the control fact solution is better? -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools4-Filter-executed-rules-by-drl-fi... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users