Re: [rules-users] How do you use Ruleflows with StatelessSession's?
Mark,
Thanks for the reply. Are there any plans to make this functionality
available directly via the API, rather than having to add a "dummy" rule
into a rulebase in order to get workflow to work with stateless sessions?
I can see how to make the change myself to ReteooStatelessSession by
adding a setRuleFlow method that sets a private processId instance that all
the execute methods can start if set (I guess an unset method wouldn't be
needed for stateless sessions). An alternative might be to add variants of
the existing execute and executeWithResults that also takes a Ruleflow
processid, but I think this would add too many variations of execute. I'll
probably have to make this change to use drools with the current application
I'm writing, as modifying the rules will not be an option - I'm happy to
submit the changes if you think this is worthwhile.
Shahad
On 8/10/07, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
you would have to call drools.getWorkingMemory().startProcess(id) from
inside of a consequence.
Mark
Shahad Ahmed wrote:
Does anyone know if it's possible to use a ruleflow with a
StatelessSession?
The current documentation and API seem to show examples with
StatefullSessions i.e.:
statefullSession.startProcess(id);
statefullSession.fireAllRules();
etc...
However, there doesn't seem to be anything equivalent in the API for
StatelessSesssion's. I'd really like to be able to use the new sequential
mode (i.e. with a StatelessSession) and ruleflow.
Regards,
Shahad
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing
listrules-users@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 3.1 KB)