Can you create a unit test that reproduces your issue. Something that follows this:
Mark
On 30 Jan 2014, at 19:49, Matteo Mortari <matteo.mortari(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
in the hope this could save time if someone has been experiencing same issue. Drools
6.0.1.Final
I had message "Cannot find KieModule" with kieServices.newKieContainer() with
LATEST or RELEASE , instead of explicit version number (eg: 0.0.1) on a application where
the KIE module Rule artifact project kjar has been locally-installed from remote Maven
repository, that is the right hand side of this diagram:
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/6.0.1.Final/drools-docs/html_single/...
Meaning that before launching Application, I performed
mvn org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-dependency-plugin:2.8:get -Dartifact=com.acme:X:LATEST
-DrepoUrl=http://nexus-hostname/nexus/content/repositories/releases/
Then:
kieServices.newKieContainer() with LATEST,
kieServices.newKieContainer() with RELEASE,
failed with stack trace:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: Cannot find KieModule:
com.acme:X:RELEASE
at
org.drools.compiler.kie.builder.impl.KieServicesImpl.newKieContainer(KieServicesImpl.java:86)
at (...)
But kieServices.newKieContainer() with a fixed version, eg.: 0.0.2 did indeed worked OK,
if installed in the local .m2 repository.
To avoid this issue, I found only 3 possible workarounds
1 use mvn maven-dependency-plugin:go-offline but did not work all of the time
2 manually ensure maven-metadata-local.xml file is generate in local .m2 repository
3 just download manually .jar and .pom of the remote maven repo, and then install with
mvn install:install-file
In this case, of workaround kieServices.newKieContainer() works OK with all the version
LATEST, RELEASE, and fixed version number.
Raise jira DROOLS-419 with more details and example projects, please don't hate me if
was just me missing something or not-Drools issue actually
=P
In my defense I had good intentions saving somebody's else time in case same strange
behavior, which is really strange because to me it worked only with explicit fixed version
number, and that was really bizarre ;)
Hope this helps,
Ciao
MM
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users