Re: [rules-users] Rules Design Question

in trunk you can do: mdOutput : ModelDiscrepancyOutput( $amt1 : sumRTVQty, sumCmAndRnr != $amt1) So you'll have to wait till you upgrade to drop the eval. Mark Ronald R. DiFrango wrote: Here is a question though now, I have the following: mdOutput : ModelDiscrepancyOutput( $amt1 : sumRTVQty, $amt2 : sumCmAndRnr) eval($amt1.doubleValue() != $amt2.doubleValue()) Is there a way for me to eliminate the eval given that it makes the rules engine sub-optimal? I guess one strategy is to create two separate classes to house the results, but man that seems messy. On 4/11/07, Ronald R. DiFrango <ron.difrango(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > > Michael, > > I got it working, but using Salience alone. > > Thanks! > > Ron > > On 4/10/07, Ronald R. DiFrango < ron.difrango(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > > > > Michael, > > > > OK, here is my attempt to convert the flow chart I have into words: > > > > Step 1: Sum ObjectA > > Step 2: Sum ObjectB > > Step 3: Sum ObjectC > > Step 4: Perform check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and do something if > > it fails > > Step 5: Perform an additional check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and do > > something if it fails > > Step 6: Perform an additional check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and do > > something if it fails > > > > I literally need it in this order and I was thinking that agenda > > groups along with salience could get me there, but I have never used them > > before. > > > > Does that help? > > > > Ron > > > > On 4/6/07, Michael Rhoden < mrhoden(a)franklinamerican.com&gt; wrote: > > > > > > Please give a better example or some pseudo code of what you are > > > trying to do. > > > > > > -Michael > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > *From:* rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto: > > > rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Ronald R. > > > DiFrango > > > *Sent:* Friday, April 06, 2007 8:15 AM > > > *To:* Rules Users List > > > *Subject:* [rules-users] Rules Design Question > > > > > > All, > > > > > > I have a rules design question for the community. I have 3 lists of > > > different types of objects that I need to sum if a certain attribute is > > > present on each one of them. Then after the summing has taken place execute > > > other rules based upon the results of the summation. > > > > > > Is there a way that I can accomplish this via salience or agenda > > > groups? > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > Ron > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users