Thanks Kris, will look into the latest snapshot
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On
Behalf Of Kris Verlaenen
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 10:27 AM
To: Rules Users List; Vijay K Pandey
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Drools Flow 5.1.0.M1 - Human Task - Client Operation -
getTasksAssignedAsPotentialOwner - does not return Task if "Comment" property is
not set
Actually, there is, and I believe the fix is already implemented in the
latest snapshot, have you tried this already?
Thanks Mauricio for the quick reply. Is there any JIRA associated
with this?
Thanks
Vijay
________________________________
From: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Mauricio
Salatino
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 12:35 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Drools Flow 5.1.0.M1 - Human Task - Client
Operation - getTasksAssignedAsPotentialOwner - does not return Task
if "Comment" property is not set
Yes.. I report that before,
but it's not really a problem. The comment makes a relationship with
all the i18n things.
For now you need to set the comment to be able to retrieve the tasks
that you want.
Greetings.
2009/11/12 Vijay K Pandey
<VPandey@mdes.ms.gov<mailto:VPandey@mdes.ms.gov>>
Hi,
Looks like there is some issue in the named query
"TasksAssignedAsPotentialOwner" for the (Drools Flow 5.1.0.M1 - Human
Task - Client Operation - getTasksAssignedAsPotentialOwner).
It does not return the Tasks if we don't specify anything in the
"Comment" property of the "Human Task". The following code was used
to retrieve the results
BlockingTaskSummaryResponseHandler responseHandler = new
BlockingTaskSummaryResponseHandler();
client.getTasksAssignedAsPotentialOwner("Luke Cage",
"en-UK",
responseHandler);
I looked at the generated SQL (given below) and look like it tries to
match the 'task id' with the "subjects_id, names_id, descriptions_id"
of the table I18NTEXT --- the values of the "subjects_id" and
"descriptions_id" goes as null because there is no "comment"
associated with the work item 'Human Task' and since its not a left
outer join on the descriptions_id - hence no returned result.
select
task0_.id as col_0_0_,
i18ntext4_.text as col_1_0_,
subjects3_.text as col_2_0_,
i18ntext5_.text as col_3_0_,
task0_.status as col_4_0_,
task0_.priority as col_5_0_,
task0_.skipable as col_6_0_,
task0_.task_data_actual_owner_id as col_7_0_,
task0_.task_data_created_by_id as col_8_0_,
task0_.created_on as col_9_0_,
task0_.activation_time as col_10_0_,
task0_.expiration_time as col_11_0_
from
WSHT_TASK task0_
left outer join
ORGANIZATIONAL_ENTITY user1_
on task0_.task_data_created_by_id=user1_.id
left outer join
ORGANIZATIONAL_ENTITY user2_
on task0_.task_data_actual_owner_id=user2_.id
left outer join
I18NTEXT subjects3_
on task0_.id=subjects3_.task_subjects_id,
I18NTEXT i18ntext4_,
I18NTEXT i18ntext5_,
ORGANIZATIONAL_ENTITY organizati6_
where
organizati6_.id=?
and (
organizati6_.id in (
select
potentialo9_.entity_id
from
PEOPLE_ASSIGNMENTS_POTENTIAL_OWNERS potentialo9_
where
task0_.id=potentialo9_.task_id
)
)
and i18ntext4_.language=?
and (
i18ntext4_.id in (
select
names10_.id
from
I18NTEXT names10_
where
task0_.id=names10_.task_names_id
)
)
and subjects3_.language=?
and i18ntext5_.language=?
and (
i18ntext5_.id in (
select
descriptio11_.id
from
I18NTEXT descriptio11_
where
task0_.id=descriptio11_.task_descriptions_id
)
)
and (
task0_.status in (
'Created' , 'Ready' , 'Reserved' ,
'InProgress' ,
'Suspended'
)
)
and (
task0_.expiration_time is null
)
Can someone throw some light on this? Do we have to have "Comment"
property set?
Thanks
Vijay
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
-
http://salaboy.wordpress.com
-
http://www.jbug.com.ar
- Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org